Auramyna

The problem is, you put your foot in your mouth in HPY3 as a baddie, throughout the game, despite your team mates telling you to stop. So this is what bothers me; that you didn't learn. Anyone can make mistakes but when you keep doing the same thing after I've witnessed other people pointing it out, and when it affects your team, it's not right.

I'll twy my best, I pwomise!

Okay, count me in XD But I might be a dead weight. :shrug:

I want to highlight Note 2. and 3. from Klue's post: 2. N1 cut-off Tuesday 8:30 AM IST = Monday 11:00 PM EDT [Post will be made 30 mins after the cut-off]. 3. If we see any role outing from goodies, we may chose to do a mod-kill or grant an additional RID Kill to baddies. If you are not sure of your hint, please confirm with us before you post it here. Seeing as note 1. was "please confirm in your ROLE THREAD" , I thought I should highlight note 3. as if you out your role or use a strong hint, there will be consequences. PM us in your role thread if you are unsure about your hint We are considering a ODTG RID kill (once during the game Role Identification Kill), carried out by the baddies so please be careful. Don't let things get ridiculous

@Nana7 - now that Slick turned up good, that puts your whole "slick, aura & tolecnal are baddies" theory up the creek. Seriously.... What Slick said about you rushing in full thrust is so true. And OOC - I would suggest you not host until you get the hang of playing. Unless of course you are a baddie. In which case, all your posts were just bs baddie talk (and I retract my last statement.) But even then, you didn't think ahead to what would happen once Slick got cleared, implicating you as decidedly bad. And probably implying that you have put blame on those not in your btsc. I mean seriously? Vote me on day 2? Why?!?!? Because km was inactive (as I replaced him, he was inactive not lying low)? Because I voted for Slick WHO TURNED UP GOOD! You were SO sure that he was bad, that you didn't consider how it would look if he's good. I actually believed you outting yourself. (Although, that was a stupid thing to do due to your actions NOT exposing Slick as bad, which was your stated motive.) But let me tell you this: outing yourself doesn't make you good. A baddie could just as easily claim a role in order to draw out a counterclaim from the real vote manip. This would be a gamechanging strategy if it worked. So in conclusion, I'm not saying your bad. I just have a little more doubt than before, due to what you did with Slick. But I don't go off half cocked exclaiming the certain truths of my suspicions. So, if you're good, pls be a bit more careful. If you're bad, I'm on to you.

Roles being sent out now. Could everyone please confirm in your role thread. This game requires everyone to be active a minimum of once or twice a cycle. So please, don't let your team mates down. Looks like a good group of players so good luck and I'll just go get me some Edit: Klue beat me to it

1. Petrus 2. tolecnal - 3. Nana7 - voting for Slick 4. TheCube - voting for tolecnal 5. mboon - Killed by baddies 6. Slick - voting for Aura 7. Zweefer 8. Aura - voting for Petrus 9. Bong - voting for Slick A. Artificial Added Slick's vote. As kristmarks's mentor, I am replacing him due to the mafia policy on inactivity ( ) @ Slick - please remove your vote from me as it is not my fault he was 100% inactive. My night role is vanilla but during the day, the goodies need all the votes they can get. So as I'm highly active, it's not a good idea to lynch me. I am a bit sceptical of this bandwagon on Slick and I'll tell you why: I did not pick up from his post that he was claiming a power role. I picked it up as his character was important. I.e - as a hint to his role rather than his night action. Anyhow, I don't feel right about voting him even though he is in the lead and my vote is useless elsewhere. I am voting for Petrus as he has been inactive and he has played this game before, so he knows better than to do that. So the conclusion I am forced to come to is that he is deliberately lying low. And if he does turn out to be a goodie, he isn't contributing a vote anyway. Better to get rid of a possible baddie/inactive goodie than an active goodie. And my gut feeling is telling me that Slick and tolecnal are not baddies. That opinion may change as the game progresses but atm, that's where I'm at.

I'm the same with people interrupting me. I hate it when I wait for another gap and start my sentence again, and get interrupted again! Especially cos it takes a second to remember what I was saying. I also have the weakness of intolerance of n00bs. I know it's wrong but it's a weak spot of mine. Luckily the people on this site are pretty intelligent so instead, I feel like the n00b. So welcome to this site; I hope you stick around. And you should check out this game we play, mafia. Links to explanations are in my signature. (Unreality brought it to BD a while back and it's been a mainstay of the site ever since!) So Nice to meet you

On ipods and iphones, if you go right down the bottom of the page, there is a link that says "full version". Pressing this puts it in non-mobile version so you can open spoilers.

@ Aki - he knows I was killed N2. He's saying no action appeared in the night post for me. As trap is at the head of the OOA, and NK is non blocking (I think!?!), the trap should've gone through. However, I trapped Nana7 who died so it didn't appear. @KM- I think you meant to say "Aura didn't appear to submit an action." I trapped nana as I was trying to confirm her guilt. If I could confirm that, I could trace it back and implicate Yodell as a baddie too (due to the links between them and due to nana's posts.) This game is the most goodie-like I have seen you act as a baddie (and probably as a goodie, even.) Confirming Medji's claim was probably the mistake you made. Earlier you publicly doubted his claim and him. You could've pointed to that later and said you were PG but that was your way of ccing Medji. And you didn't outright cc him as u hoped the baddies would waste a NK on you. But some later post you made took that option away. I was actually cheering you on, then I realised I was a goodie But I just wanted to say you did impressive. @Nana7 - It's not the amount of posts, it's what you said. You can say you can't be someone you're not but you have a duty to your team mates not to bring heat on them . As you can see, I also post a lot. That isn't a problem once you play a few games and realise the "tells" that give yourself away. It is obvious from the puzzle threads how intelligent you are and once you get a few games under your belt, I'm kinda worried how good you'll get. @Yodell - what got in your way was getting blocked N1. Without that, I reckon you would have got away with your goodie act. I still didn't "know" you were bad. I almost trapped you, not to block a baddie action, but to find out if you were bad or good. So you must've said something to sway me into not being sure. Why didn't you believe me that I was Draco and didn't get a spy on nana? *cries* *no one ever believes me* *waaaaah* Aki didn't submit a suit of cards in time so had a 0% chance to spy N1 (no roll took place.)

Yeah, molly answered that way, way at the start of the thread. (Way, wa-a-a-ay back there.)

As Klue said, we will start after TMM V reaches N2. Seeing as TMM is about to begin (roles are out etc.), by the time this fills up, it will be time to begin. So, go ahead and sign up! With only 6 places left, positions could fill fast, once word gets out...

What are you doing in a Newbie Mafia, Slick? Do you need a mentor? (jk)

@YoDell - sorry if I misconstrued your tone of voice; it was just the. ... and the capital letters that led me to read it as sarcastic. Yeah, I see that you got the hint, I acknowledged that to you by the way I answered your qu. About the reading deeper, one reason for posts can be to gauge the reaction. Baddies will often give themselves away by how they react, even not reacting can be a giveaway. @Klue - Just for arguments sake, if I were Snape (which I'm not), I wouldn't go for Miki as she could be good. I would go for someone who has acted suspicious and had time to defend. That way, if they turn up good, you can put the blame on their shoulders. I wouldn't want to make a mistake, though, as losing a goodie would ruin us much more than not killing off a baddie. At this point, I would crunch the numbers and if possible, I wouldn't act unless we almost "had to" kill a baddie tonight. I don't think Snape should kill Yodell until we are a bit more sure about her innocence or guilt. What did you mean scummy? Were you referring to me saying I can't see a disincentive for PG outing, or something about the block and trap. You wouldn't start throwing BS suspicion on me would you? Cos that would be giving your baddieness away and I doubt you'd be that obvious. Nah, I still believe you're good, for now. @nana7 - Yes, the goodie block is dead but I was referring to the baddie block; although it's target is a goodie, it is still a public spy, and if the baddie block target was trapped, it would mean only one public spy instead of two.

Although if she's bad and we can confirm it, then who cares if she can't talk? I hope the block and trap don't target the same person as that would be a waste. Do we know who Pettigrew is? Because he is immune from NK so I don't see any disincentive for outing. (Forgive me if I missed the post that said who PG is.)

Fabpig - Prominent Member Lolz, was that deliberate?

Oh, I forgot to say: I don't know if Anon truly agrees with me or is jumping on my suspicions and running with it, to strengthen suspicion on others, hence not himself. I hope you are being honest with me, Anon. I need to be able to trust your good intuitions. Just that after that game where we were baddies together, I know how cunning you are with your "theories", mark my words, MARK IT!

Out of curiosity, who would you suggest is blocked if we could choose? Plzzzz ansa sooon so ah cn put ma acshun inzzz.... Nah jks

Yes, I'm aware it's night cycle. I take offence at what you said, which insults my intelligence, and the way you said it, which was rude. I said in my first post that I would be back in a bit after I'd read the thread, to give my impression on things, due to replacing Aki. That was why I went through and listed off what I thought. I didn't mean lynch now. Also, by now you should have learned not to take posts at face value. You need to look deeper. There are reasons for everything people post; the meaning for things is sometimes a few layers removed. I could explain further but I don't know if you're on my team so I don't want to give away my secrets. As for my action, all info I have is available to all in the night post; I didn't receive anything extra. I didn't throw you off my scent. Everything I said was true. Yes, I hinted, if that's what you mean OOC: I am so glad we're getting along. See? I told you the "tiffs" were over. It's okay. I was just stating that I'd observed you lying low. I didn't place any meaning on it and I fully accept your reason I am getting the exact same read on them. So either they are bad, or one of them is bad and the other doesn't realise and is defending them, or they are acting like this due to inexperience. It's just that I have a lot of respect for nana7's puzzle solving abilities on this site so I wouldn't expect her to make blanket statements that are slightly wrong logically. But then again, perhaps she isn't up on all the nuances of mafia quite yet. KM knows that if I see something that I (maybe wrongly) perceive as faulty logic, I assume they are a baddie. It may not be the case.

Isn't anyone going to say smth about my puerile joke? I really don't know why but it had me cracking up. Hint: there is no "some random guy"