Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

CaptainEd

Members
  • Posts

    1398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by CaptainEd

  1. Sorry, proof was right, but method for calculation was confusing
  2. Tricky enough as it is—here is my first cut
  3. We are not limited to convex figures, right?
  4. Mixed strategies for you and for me
  5. Is it possible that the needles are actually...
  6. Rodocmac, thank you, but I’ll pass. I’ve posted “oops” enough for now :-)
  7. Thanks, rodocmac Ants on octahedron Once again attempting to count unique permutations
  8. Cute, Bonanova! Good solve Molly Mae!
  9. Ants on octahedron Once again attempting to count unique permutations
  10. Please disregard this post. I now understand that 50/50 does not mean probability 1.
  11. Rocdocmac, we are clearly well matched: I had a misenumeration and a miscount, and I’ll raise you my typographical error.
  12. Ants on cube Now I see it would be easier if I counted permutations.
  13. Plasmid, that’s an impressively simple solution to all the n=3 mazes! Of course, the 5x5 solution is impressive, too! Harey, this is a very interesting puzzle.
  14. tetrahedron: success only if no two ants arrive at same cell
  15. Woops, I did not consider the possibility of two ants arriving at the same vertex through different paths...
  16. (a) and (b), haven't done (c) yet: I assume a trial consists of all ants moving from one vertex to one other vertex. (In other words, we aren't asked about the probability of them never colliding, no matter how far they wander)). icosagon tetrahedron
  17. Here’s a degenerate answer
  18. Kay_Kay, I don’t follow the argument.
×
×
  • Create New...