Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

bonanova

Moderator
  • Content Count

    6962
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

bonanova last won the day on April 23

bonanova had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

83

1 Follower

About bonanova

  • Rank
    Retired Expert
  • Birthday November 3

Profile Fields

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ohio
  • Interests
    Choral music, performing and directing, photography.

Recent Profile Visitors

27935 profile views
  1. Previously, Maiden’s boat could change its heading instantaneously. Ogre’s heading could change only by virtue of following a circular path along the shore at his current speed. His rotational speed was thus far from infinite, and perhaps that disadvantage was unfair. So in this final puzzle iteration we’ll limit the boat’s linear speed to be f times that of Ogre, as before, but now we’ll also limit the boat’s angular speed to be never greater than g times Ogre’s top angular speed. A moment’s thought tells us that unless g is greater than unity the boat’s best strategy is to run at full speed from the center to the shore, keeping its initial bearing, no matter where on the shore Ogre initially stands. That is, never to turn the boat. That sucks for Maiden (e.g., she loses if Ogre initially stands at the boat's initial heading) and it sucks as a puzzle. So we’ll say the boat can change heading faster than Ogre can. For clarity we’ll set g = 2. We’ll implement that limit by giving the boat’s motor three discrete settings that can be switched instantly an unlimited number of times: clockwise (CW), full speed ahead (FSA), and counterclockwise (CCW.) In the two turning modes the boat turns but maintains its position; in FSA mode it moves forward but does not turn. Boat’s path is thus a succession of arbitrarily short line segments joined at angles of Maiden's choosing, with the time cost of the angle depending on its size. If the boat starts in the middle of the lake, how large must f now be for Maiden to escape? Edit: Extra credit (tough): If Ogre's top speed is 1 lake-radius per minute, and Maiden chooses the boat's initial heading at the center, what's her shortest time safely to shore?
  2. Yes it is possible. The Triborough Bridge in New York connects Manhattan, the Bronx and' Queens.
  3. Hmmm. I hadn't considered that. Is there a different solution if the murderer did not own the murder weapon?
  4. Nicely done. As for adding some wrinkle to the problem, how about this? Suppose we have to add some time for her to get out of the boat before she starts to run. We could say the ogre must have an angular separation of s radians from the boat when it lands, and then minimize f. Hmmm. I'm guessing the same path just minimizes f to a slightly larger value. Hi @The Lonewolf Brand and welcome to the Den. That would mean the maiden's boat and the ogre have the same speed. She can escape from a faster ogre.
  5. Interesting idea. How would we pose that question exactly? .
  6. What a deliciously challenging and intriguing puzzle.
  7. If you think you've heard this one before, read it carefully. It's not the standard puzzle. A beautiful maiden sits in a boat at the center of circular lake. On shore waits an ogre anxious to have his way with her. Being an excellent sprinter she knows she can outrun and therefore escape the lumbering ogre if only she can land her boat safely. But should the ogre reach her landing point first, alas, all will be lost. The boat is propelled by a motor capable of only a fraction f of the ogre's speed. What is the minimum value of f that will permit the Maiden to escape?
  8. That's some two-year-old. And yes, it's time to ..
  9. @EventHorizon said, But once Plato says that "one die is a 4," it doesn't merely prune out the ones without 4's. That’s the crux of it. EH is correct that this reads on Monty Hall. But more directly on the long-running Teanchy-Beanchy post (one of his two kids is a girl, what’s the probability he has two girls.) First people said has to be 1/2. Then others (including me) said (all that matters is that) it can’t be BB so it’s 1/3. Both wrong. so I made this one up to show that the informant’s algorithm has to be known. Nicely explained.
  10. And so thought poor Aristotle until today's class. He knew the probability of two dice making seven, until his teacher told him the value of one of his dice. Then he reasoned it to be different. Ah, the magic of conditional probability, he thought. But then he reasoned further that it was not the knowledge of which value one of his dice had, for it did not matter whether that value was 1 2 3 4 5 or 6. It was seemingly only that it had a value. But what kind of conditional probability is that? Was he not already aware of that? One of his dice has a particular value. Six values engender six cases. In each particular case he reasons the probability of seven changes to a new value. Worse, there are no other cases. Therefore in every case it changes to a new value. How then could it have the value he originally imagined? So there's the question that lurks within the flavor text. Beneath the surface perhaps, but now fully revealed for all to ponder.
  11. @CaptainEd Brilliant.
  12. @flamebirde Yes. The gun’s owner did the deed. Implied but not stated. Good catch.
  13. If it takes the 10-car Silver Streak passenger train twice as long* to pass the 93-car Big Boy steam freight train going in the same direction as it does going the opposite direction, what is the ratio of their speeds? *Meaning the time during which there is any overlap of the trains.
  14. Now, what was it we were talking about? Oh yes ... wherrzzz Beeel? I'll tell you. You know why I tell you? Because Bill would want me to. But this time the old man was not talking to the impossibly gorgeous Beatrix Michelle Kiddo. It was to a guy. A guy who was on a mission to kill Bill. A guy with the name of Al, Jack, Joe or Tom. Which one? Well, it's your job to determine which. Here's what we know from police interviews that followed the discovery of Bill's cold body on a lonely stretch of country road late last night, along with the fatal gun that belonged to one of them ... the murderer. So read on and see where the evidence leads. But fair warning, exactly half of each of the suspects' four statements are lies. Al: I didn't do it. Tom did it. Sure I own a gun. Joe and I were playing poker last night when Bill was shot. Jack: I didn't do it. Al did it. Joe and I were at the movies last night when Bill was shot. Bill was shot with Joe's gun. Joe: I was asleep when Bill was shot. Al lied when he said that Tom killed Bill. Jack is the only one of us who owns a gun. Tom and Bill were pals. Tom: I've never fired a gun in my life. I don't know who did it. Joe doesn't own a gun. I never saw Bill until they showed me the body. Who was the rat who done poor Bill in?
×
×
  • Create New...