Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


bonanova last won the day on April 16

bonanova had the most liked content!

Community Reputation


1 Follower

About bonanova

  • Rank
    Retired Expert
  • Birthday November 3

Profile Fields

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    Choral music, performing and directing, photography.

Recent Profile Visitors

26296 profile views
  1. bonanova


    I'll give these a shot.
  2. bonanova

    Logic Puzzle with 26 Variables

    Hi Tomson, and welcome to the Den. An oldie but goodie.
  3. bonanova

    I'm not a bird

    Poe, E. Near a Raven Midnights so dreary, tired and weary. Silently pondering volumes extolling all by-now obsolete lore. During my rather long nap -- the weirdest tap! An ominous vibrating sound disturbing my chamber's antedoor. 'This,' I whispered quietly, 'I ignore.' - Mike Keith, 1995
  4. bonanova

    Rodent Riddle

    I watch word riddles in awe from the sidelines cuz my brain is wired deductively rather than inductively. On this one, tho, as a musician of sorts, I have to say, bravo! Great riddle and great solve!
  5. bonanova

    Bowling for equilateral triangles

    OK thx.
  6. bonanova

    I might be a writer

    That's the answer I'm looking for. If you put your two posts together, you've got it.
  7. bonanova

    Brain Teaser

    Agree. If "Heidi" is the intended subject of "found," a 2nd "who" would serve no purpose except to confuse. It would not be used. Instead, Heidi is { immediately right of (Person A) } and found { more caches than (Person B) }. But since there are two "who"s, it's proper to bind them to the same (and closest) antecedent: ..... (Person A) { who has flown ... } and { who found more ... } 7) Heidi is immediately right of the person who has flown over from the States, and who found more caches than the UK cacher. 40 Traditional cache where found by a European cacher, their favourite type. Agree. They could not be Pitches 3 and 5, for example. I also fixed a typo in my interpretation post.
  8. bonanova

    Square Free

  9. bonanova

    Brain Teaser

    My interpretations I believe gives this solution
  10. bonanova

    Riddle of Lies

  11. bonanova

    I might be a writer

    Yes, sir, that is exactly the right track.
  12. bonanova

    One Girl - One Boy

    They are equally likely but they are not the same. But it's worse than that. The OP is deficient, because it does not tell us how we came to know what we know. Instead, let's create a situation where we know how we know what we know, and therefore will let us find the probability that "the other kid is a girl," unambiguously. Doing that, we know the answer is 1/3.
  13. bonanova


    So, while not being a correct solution, this would meet that qualification?