Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Okay...I give up on trying to make Harry red for killing curr3nt... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 And day ends tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Okay...so a ghost pointed out an error in the NP for N2. The only way I can fix it is by alerting you to the fact that there is exactly one error in the NP. Other than the name typo error, that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 You can't just tell us what it is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 It would out a player. That is a totally inviolable no-no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Good job Snape and, now I know what I wanted to know... vote will be placed once I am back from office, though you already know who to vote for... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Actually, I don't know who to go for, since Anon is cleared. On the other hand, I suspect that you mean me, and if so, then you're barking up the wrong tree. I fit the hole that was made, with plenty of room to spare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon26 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Indeed, Good job Snape. Now much can be deduced from Nana's post.. I say, she was defending Yodell to actually save herself. which sort of clear Yodell (not completely) She vouched for Medji, which means Medji is suspicious in my books. Medji defended Yodell, which sorta saved Nana. medji said he handed out hints. While I couldnt find them (actually couldnt find 10 of em) I was thinking that if Nana have got Medji's role, and Nana is a baddy, then that would mean that she might go for him.(if he is a power role). So either Medji do not have a power role, or is a baddy. (Just my thoughts..) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 I saw one post from Medji that could be taken as a hint but it was after he said 10 hints. Something about having his tail handed to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) Well, Medji has claimed to be Pettigrew and none has counter-claimed him. This means either of the two things: 1. Medji is indeed pettigrew 2. Pettigrew is dead, and Medji is a baddie The best way to test the theory is Snape attempting to NK Medji. If Medji is indeed Pettigrew, he won't be killed. Thus, his matter can be put to rest until the night. Right now, I've one simple thing to do: To out the one that was lying low... Dumbledore: Shadow7 McGonagall: TheCube 1. MiKi 2. Zweefer 3. Thalia 4. Nana7 5. KlueMaster - voting for kaniac 6. Akriti 7. Medji 8. kaniac 9. Anon26 10. yoDell 11. curr3nt Edited July 19, 2011 by KlueMaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon26 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Dumbledore: Shadow7 McGonagall: TheCube 1. MiKi 2. Zweefer 3. Thalia 4. Nana7 5. KlueMaster - voting for kaniac 6. Akriti 7. Medji 8. kaniac 9. Anon26 - voting for kaniac 10. yoDell 11. curr3nt Helping mount pressure. Tho I may change to Medji later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Klue's internet is down and he will be unavailable for the rest of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Net is up again and so am I... Though, it seems rest of the people aren't... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon26 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Yup, no activity! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 I was wondering how long it would take for people to realize that all the hand references were referring to Pettigrew cutting his hand off. Actually, I see no reason to keep it secret anymore, since Hermione was Nana, and I'm sure she knew, which means the only advantage that I had in keeping it secret is gone. Remember when I said that every hand I've given is in the form of a riddle? Pettigrew literally cut off his hand and placed it into a cauldron in order to provide flesh for the reincarnation of Tom Riddle (Voldemort), and so is a part of his new form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon26 Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 I seem to forgot this part.(in the book, read it long time back) This saves you for now Medji.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Anyone have any idea what the mistake in the night post was? I thought maybe Medji was a Dementor so Sirius should have been trapped but I also think he claimed pretty early. It was a mistake that would have outted someone but I can't come up with a scenario that would do that other than Medji being a Dementor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Upon reminders from our ghosts, it doesn't quite out, but is still far too close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 The mistake was actually outing me. It says that there was no revelation. No revelation means that I didn't target anyone, and the only other person that wouldn't target is a dementor, who would have...bum, bum, buuuummmm....bocked Sirius again. At least that was my take on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Oh, OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissKitten Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 The mistake was actually outing me. It says that there was no revelation. No revelation means that I didn't target anyone, and the only other person that wouldn't target is a dementor, who would have...bum, bum, buuuummmm....bocked Sirius again. At least that was my take on it. Really? Oh, I thought it meant you weren't Harry, cuz Sirius was seeking Harry, but had no revelation, so didn't find him. And you're claiming Pettigrew, so it fits. But I guess your theory would work too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 FAQ: *Trap is full cycle (extends during the day, does not act like a save) *NK is only blocked if it's on Pettigrew; Harry Potter is only shown as carrier for the story *The person Sirius redirected will be informed of this via the night-post, but they will not know their new target. *Redirects on trapped players fail. *Redirects on people with no action show up as successful This is why I think that my theory is correct. *all same-level actions occur *D1, tie=no lynch, else random Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissKitten Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 However, it's not Harry who has the NK, correct? It's the baddies; Harry's just the carrier for the story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Right, but I'm saying that redirects on targets without an action (pettigrew/dementor) show as successful, but in the post, Shadow put out that Snape was not successful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissKitten Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) I don't quite get what you're saying... edit: Could you elaborate? Edited July 19, 2011 by MissKitten Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.