plainglazed
-
Posts
5111 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by plainglazed
-
-
that's it! and the briliant ungulate rings up another. and thanks for the encouragement
-
that one works and was what I had, too. wouldn't put it past me on the last one. this one is different. the two words to the answer I have in mind might be considered doubly synonomous; with two completely different definitions thanks for mentioning but no worries. I have been somewhat, also. knew this one was pretty tough. partially because it was quite difficult to come up with qualifying answers. Also, because of that, I thought there wouldn't be so many alternatives. maybe just a bad puzzle. hey benjer3 - thanks for playing. I was skeptical of the relationship between the second words but looked up account and discovered "to account for" something can mean to put out of action; kill. So, okay. Nice
-
STIFF
-
S C R U B AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 SEEKS - 1 SEEDS - 1 STOOL - 1 SCOUT - 3 SCRUM - 4 SCRUB - 5 +20 maurice +10 shadow7 +13 plainglazed shadow7's up - EDIT: okay - now see mo's proof for R but still going to give it to shadow as I also breezed over his uncapitalized thought. I know, I know, am a crummy host.
-
S C _ U _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 SEEKS - 1 SEEDS - 1 STOOL - 1 SCOUT - 3 SCRUM - 4 +15 maurice
-
S _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 SEEKS - 1 SEEDS - 1 STOOL - 1 SCOUT - 3 +5 maurice right on, corrected
-
S _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 SEEKS - 1 SEEDS - 1 STOOL - 1 +5 maurice EDIT: with three minutes to spare
-
S _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 SEEKS - 1 +5 maurice Have to step out for a minute. Be back within an hour.
-
S _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 SHEET - 1 SWEEP - 1 +5 maurice
-
_ _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 1 FIEND - 0 TRUTH - 0 ughhh, you got me all flustered and i messed up. see corrected response above. won't count FIEND and TRUTH in final tally. sorry, all.
-
_ _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 0 FIEND - 0 no worries on that word. think we all here qualify for both.
-
_ _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 SWEET - 0 ah shucks, thanks
-
_ _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0 JOUST - 0 HELLO - 0 hope I didnt overstep in that last puzzle. if I did, apologies. * wondering - do I read too much into these guesses?*
-
_ _ _ _ _ AHEAD - 0 GREED - 0
-
okay, g'head _ _ _ _ _
-
that proof is still a little KLUTZy Maq.
-
BLUFF
-
-
wow, another one already? that's impressive. how many does that make? you need to slow down. Oooooh, it's your birthday... here's hoping yours is safe and festive. cheers!
-
-
seems to be a rather slow stretch here in the Den, Deter. Please dont be deterred.
-
-
Apples to Apples and other such things
plainglazed replied to tiger_lily111's question in New Word Riddles
-
Eh well. Try a few more. hey t_l - accept your argument and answer for the one from before. kinda see a connection with those two words in terms of an estimation as well. can also make arguments for the two new answers as well. still have different ones in mind. disclaimer - one of the words in my answer for the "Jealous Nut" clue is more of a type than a synonomous word. sorry bout that. all other connections are definitie synonyms. Also - where A B --> C D; A and C, B and D , C and D are synonomous BUT any three are not necessarily so.