#1:
"hight of hubris"???
Im sorry, but im confused.
"a silly argument i merely replied..." what did u reply? that theres no knowledge? And you're twisting my words: I said a house is made my man, and that THE HOUSE DOES NOT JUST APPEAR. I was trying to make...a metaphor of sorts? I dont knwo what to call it, but the way your twisting my words makes it sound like im the idiot. Im sure you understood what i was trying to say. your agnostic. great. your not trying to disprove, your jsut trying to confuse. great. theres is also no, nada, nil, zilch, sweet f*** all proof of gods NON-existence.
2nd P:
1) yes they do. science doesnt, says it came from an explosion or that it just always WAS
2) just because they differ doesnt mean science is the immediate "go-to." Science isnt in a catagory all by itself, but just saying "i dont know" is not the answer. one of those "myths" could be true, and others BASED on it just got it wrong. just because they differ doesnt mean that science is suddenly right.
3) "ALL religions are BOGUS" wow. religions differ widly, and the main common thing (ONLY common thing really) is that they believe some higher power. dont dismiss them all because you find one wrong. again, refer to point #2.
4) now your saying that all religions are bogus, but then your saying that god might exist although you seem to be fighting against it. im kind of confused. Just because you dont subscribe to any one relgion doesnt make them bogus. I dont like to eat beets, but i dont want to wipe them off the earth.
5) and now your saying it could be 1 god, or many. again: dont dismiss religions if your not happy with them. you dont know, but that doesnt mean that everyone else is suddenly stupid for believing what they believe. you just seem to be in the place of "i dont know, so dont touch me cause thats my argument," yet seem to be fighting against theists. again: im confused.