Yay, that's ... actually not improving your previous answer.
Short recap:
- you're dodging why you voted GM in the first place
- you're dodging why you don't want a tie with Framm as sole survivor
- you mentioned then backed out of a too harsh claim
- you still don't mention why you're voting Phil atm
So, not changing my vote.
1. I voted GM as to put more pressure onto one person as opposed to spreading out the votes and having a tie. Like now, for instance.
2. Because if Framm turned out to be AQ or Nefer, that would be a ridiculously pitiful way to end the game. but if you want that tie, I'll go for it.
3. Well, at least someone else got it.
4. Because he has said nothing, and although he may be a goodie, better an inactive than an active.
Anything else?