fabpig
-
Posts
2423 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by fabpig
-
Edit...added apology!
-
-
Hi troy... sorry, but that's a "no" to all....
-
errmm, after discussions with my travel agent, it has been decided that there are now THREE more cities I will NOT be visiting,,,, memo to self: Get A Grip
-
I don't know where you're not going, though. Btw love the name of the thread. Hey, thanks .......bad news tho. Not a one of those!!
-
oops sorry.. there are TWO more cities I will NOT be visiting
-
I'm on one of my "short of funds" tours again. So there are only so many cities I can visit before the money runs out....... So far I've been to: Concord Providence Dover I will NOT be visiting: Frankfort There are 5 more cities I will be visiting And 1 more I will definitely not. So which cities will I visit, and which will I definitely not go to? (and why?) If this stagnates, I'll add an extra city to my 'will' list every so often. To the good citizens of Frankfort (and the other place, yet to be discovered): nothing personal.
-
Scotch, Cup, Fingers - _Butter Milk, Wisdom, Eye - ______
-
-
-
AWW SORRY JDave, I meant the total scores.....
-
Sorry I can't hang around fellas, but the scores seem to be somewhat awry........
-
What surprises me is the huge discrepancy in the population per EV over the states. We have a similar "first past the post" system - but we vote for a party rather than an individual - with each of our "constituencies" sending 1 member to parliament: there are (apprx) 650 MPs so each constituency has about 100,000 poplulation. Every so often ,there is a review of the constituency populations, and if needs be the constituency boundaries are altered to give a fairer representation (doesn't happen very often). As we're more of a 3 party state than US, the 3rd party (Liberal Democrats) have been complaining for the last umpteen years that the number of MPs that they send to London does not reflect the number of votes that they receive nationwide, and that some sort of Proportional Representation would be fairer. SO.......the last election gave no party overall majority, and so the Lib Dems formed a coalition with the Tory party with the proviso that there be a referendum on electoral reform. We've just had that referendum and it was rejected out-of-hand by the BrItish public! I understand that Australia currently use an electoral system similar to the one rejected over here: that it's pretty-well hated countrywide and they want a quick return to first past the post. WombatBreath will be able to tell you more than I can. Sorry if that's a bit -off-topic, but something I found interesting and hoped you might.
-
SECUND - if 1 then O is 4th due to SECOND = 2
-
FLITTER - if 1 then I is 3rd from FetTlEd = pLasTic = 0 and janiToR = 1 (A PROVEN). Only I can score. Headsup - u missed Aar's THINKER
-
CONSENT
-
B4 I looked it up, I'd have agreed with you Q, but ricochetted is acceptable alternative in my dictionary. I think unagreeable means (eg) food that doesn't agree with you.
-
JANITOR
-
CRUMPETS
-
PLASTIC
-
STRUMPET
-
SPLURGE
-
EROTIC
-
EROTICA
