plainglazed
-
Posts
5111 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by plainglazed
-
Cool answer. Would never have thought of that but certainly see the fit. Crazy amazing what you denners can find! Most excellent guess(es) DN. Obviously put some thought into this one. You must have a lot of spare time on your hands . Not it but please keep at it.
-
Great riddle badudi! Didnt get a chance, well, wasn't able to formulate a complete guess. And well done Jkb! How the...
-
I know it isn't right, but wanted to get this one going Wow, way to get this one going guys. Great guesses all, but not what I'm looking for.
-
Once I was in conflict with Your winning more than twice. But now I am beginning To ignore all your advice. Starting out with nothing, It's easy to lose one's face. Now and then, from beginning to end You end up fallen from grace. For who is the center of attention, It never much mattered to me. So one for one, none for all Has become your chosen finale.
-
-
-
Yeah, I know, this one's done but was asked- Cheers and thanks again. Be back soon...
-
-
Yes indeed, well done DudleyDude. Thanks to all!
-
Well I "turned the page" with my reply to MrsP and look what's already there. Right on DD. Thanks Dont know how I replied at first without typing anything so this is in edit mode.
-
Hey Hey MrsP - actually very very close! Are you taking anything for your illness? Dont mean to imply your mind may be altered, well okay, maybe . In all seriousness, hope you're feeling better.
-
Hello Jkb - Great thoughts above, very clever and thorough. Makes it tough to say no but must. I am really not liking how this one is going. I say this as apology and to take the blame. Dont know if this will help or confuse but:
-
Probably not it though. Not overly disparate as you know how to work mine as evidenced by your answer(s) above and although I would desparately like to yes, those are not it.
-
-
Not on the right track with the brand name question. Gubdude posted the correct reference to the first line. I also mentioned to Jkb that the third line really is the least important in terms of leading to the answer and that the relation between the two M.J.s is not really significant in regards to finding the answer itself (dont want to say too much more). I really like the strike a nerve explanation but am afraid that too is not where I'm at with that clue.
-
Not so bizarre, cant tell for sure but may on the right track as to how to solve/guess. Still not it tho. None of that Im afraid DN. Are you giving hints to your puzzle here? Maybe I'm just over reading. Dang those POWs. As soon as you start thinking that way, they are everywhere, right? Hey Wilson, que pasa? Oo (so) long since we've riddled it seems. Not that but get how that works with at least the second half of the riddle.
-
Only M.J. <--> Coppola connection I gotsk. And no resolution of the POW which I hopefully now can concentrate on after getting this answer off my chest.
-
Ah, like juggling a hot potato? No need to rearrange the lines but probably goes without saying that some lines are independent of others, or not, or both.
-
Not either of those DN. Your explanations aint accurate either except of course about dessert and desperation but that is the case regardless of the context of this riddle.
-
-
For real? And I thought I was just being cute. Well, good looks and brains? Who'da thought.
-
"Bad" I wouldn't say bad, but I wouldn't say correct either.
-
edit: Oh. It's just white. Hey yo DN - No relationship to the J in M.J. is needed. May give a hint as to the structure of the riddle in a bit if needed. Busy is good. And, yeah, the color is off white to just hide the underscores in order to indent every other line. No relevence to the riddle or answer. ..but doesn't really fit. Good guess MrsP but incorrect. Any relation to the two M.J.s is not directly relevant to the answer. Dont hate me, please.
-
EDIT:sorry....did have to look up where i remebered them 2 together...IE "video" Hey Jkb, need to steer you away from the two M.J.s. Gubdude made the correct reference to M.J. in the first line. The third line's connection to the answer is probably the most tenuous of them all. Sorry no, nothing to do with those. your last guess was the closest so far but probably should not say that because the answer is more easily recognized elsewhere I think.
-