Izzy

But I was blocked? Hmm. Araver has enough votes on him, so pressure exists there. Let's see how well Maurice can defend. Hosts: NickFleming and EDM 1. maurice - Voting for Araver 3. MissKitten 4. Araver - Voting for Vipe195 5. Vipe195 6. Izzy is voting for Maurice 7. Molly 8. DD 9. Vineetrika - Voting for Araver 10. Glycereine - Voting for Maurice 11. Marq 13. onetruth

Hosts: NickFleming and EDM 1.maurice 3.MissKitten 4.araver - Voting for Vipe195 5.Vipe195 6. Izzy is voting for Glycereine 7. Molly 8. DD 9. Vineetrika - Voting for Araver 10. Glycereine - Voting for Araver 11. Marq 13. onetruth You're also fairly active and capable of defending. Talk?

I agree with DD. It wasn't so much the night ending early that I cared about as much as the day starting without me knowing about it and possible ending sooner than I anticipated. Why don't you have days end at like 5 pm every day or some other time conveinient for you?

As my defense, I was blocked last night, so from last night alone I can't be the Surveillance Specialist, The Interrogator, or the person who killed Slick2.0. This leaves two FBI members, and I'd rather not give away more than I need to at the moment. This, albeit weak, defense should suffice at least for *right* now. I'll be back with an analysis and a vote later.

Holy crap, can you two stop ending the nights early?

Yes, but in a game when validity is objective, your statement could have certain implications about which I am curious. IzzyPoo? Lawl. Adorable.

Was that a hint?

We could just start referring to the factions as cops and mafia? As long as people know the mafia are the majority, there shouldn't be a problem.

Are you claiming goodiness?

*cough* Mebe. I don't really do role analysis until Day 1/Night 2 because I'm never sure if I'll live through Night 1. >_> Honest mistake guys. I apologize. Vipe, you can relax now.

*facepalm* I thought the different greens represented two different indies. Ah well. Nonsense? Wasting my time? At least I'm encouraging conversation in this thread and people helping one another. Better than refusing to defend and calling out those that are actually talking.

Also, if the Inside Man dies but fulfills his wincon before his death, will he be victorious? If the answer to this is no, someone should take out Slick tonight. I mean, the Inside Man didn't act last night which can mean one of two things: a. Inactivity b. The role belonged to someone intelligent enough to realize that they could kill the partner. However, if the Inside Man killed his partner, he could have killed himself, insuring a win, right? Due to inheiriting a role from an inactive and then giving a total misrepresentation of it, I would say Slick is suspect. And no, this is not a vendetta against Slick. This "Hey, look.. this makes sense.."

What are you talking about? Guys, Vipe needs to be protected tonight to the best of our ability. If the Inside Man kills him, he will win. Nick/EDM, when you say the inside man wins with the FBI, does that mean he can win it for the FBI? Like, if the Inside Man kills Vipe tonight, does the FBI win as well, or is it an indy win. If Vipe is targeted for death by multiple people, will this still cause the Inside Man to win if he contributed to Vipe's death? If the answer to the second quesiton is no, the hitman should talk out Vipe tonight. If the answer is yes, well, try to take the Inside Man out.

Where's the "No punishment because this is silly and will annoy everyone further." option?

Pissed Slick or not, I would consider that a successful lynch.

Depending on how many vets the FBI has, it's very likely they'd target their own early on to "confirm" baddies that end up screwing over everyone later. With regards to MK, this either means Slick tried to kill her, she's the Godfather, or the bodyguard got lucky. Given that the bodyguard hasn't indicated who he blocked last night and I don't want to kill the Godfather, that lives Slick. Hosts: NickFleming and EDM 1.maurice - voting for DD 2.jakeknowslittle 3.MissKitten - voting for Molly 4.araver - voting for DD 5.Vipe195 - voting for Slick 6. Izzy is voting for Slick] 7. Molly - voting for Slick 8. DD - voting for Vipe195 9. Vineetrika - voting for Molly 10.Glycereine - voting for Vine 11.Marq - Voting for Izzy 12 Slick - voting for Glycereine 13. onetruth - voting for Vine

What happens in the instances of a tie vote?

DD, because I haven't played with you in ages. It will gives the noobs an idea of what a good defense consists of, and you're generally a good player to clear early on. Hosts: NickFleming and EDM 1.maurice - voting for araver 2.jakeknowslittle 3.MissKitten - voting for Molly 4.araver - voting for DD 5.Vipe195 6. Izzy is voting for DD 7. Molly 8. DD 9. Vineetrika 10.Glycereine 11.Marq 12 Slick.- voting for Glycereine 13. onetruth - voting for Vine

^Phaze isn't playing in this one, so that's a little less of a concern.

Another approach: Let's take the nonexistence of Gawd as a premise. The opposite of something that doesn't exist is something that does exist. The universe exists, therefore the universe is the opposite of Gawd. The opposite of happiness is sadness, therefore the universal sadness is Gawd's happiness.

I share a state with idiots. I'd post what my Facebook status post-election results was, but it might get me banned. Three ammendments went the way I wanted them to, though. WTF California?

Electiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectiondayelectionday!!!! Hey Floridians, give me a reason to have some faith in humanity, yeah? Talked to my English teacher today, and he didn't vote for Rick Scott<3. Atheist liberals ftw. Ahem. >_> Alex Sink, Yes on 4, Yes on 5 and 6. NO on 8. Lez doo this. *crosses fingers for legalized weed in California* This is be the first step in fair drug rights, methinks/mehopes. Who am I kidding? More nervous than excited. =/

Open season? Vets, atttaaaackkk! ...whut, don't judge. You know you've wanted to since 9 pm last night. Hosts: NickFleming and EDM 1.maurice 2.jakeknowslittle 3.MissKitten 4.araver 5.Vipe195 6. Izzy 7. Molly 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Mentor/Backup: 1.Framm 2.Glycereine 3.Marquessa 4. JarZe

That's not exactly what I meant (poor phrasing on my part). (This isn't meant to seem condescending or anything, not that I'd think either of you would interpret it like that, just a disclaimer. ) I'm in IB. I'm a sophomore with a 4.65 GPA. (All A's. It would be a 4.78 if I wasn't an idiot and didn't take Latin online and German freshman year. Freaking 4.0 classes. ;_ Compared to the school, I'm in the 99th percentile. I think there are two kids in my grade with higher GPAs, and that's only because they're taking AP classes online and their middle schools offered foreign languages, so are already in the 5.0 weighted language classes. Basically, GPA isn't an accurate representation of intelligence, yet that's what we all fuss over. I'm smarter than the people I know with higher GPAs than me, yet I can think of one stunning example of a kid with a modest GPA (above 4.5) that..is just completely beyond the level of anything any of us are doing. Am I infinitely jealous? Hell yeah. He's also one of my best friends, and he's just so chill about it. Anyway, all these 4.5+ GPA kids are together. I think 4.82 is the maximum GPA a current sophomore can have, and that's only if they took high school biology in middle school (only one school I know of offered it), and either high school French or Spanish in middle school (two offered it). That would require taking all AP/IB classes aside from chem sophomore year and two AP electives and AP biology freshman year. Doable. Difficult. Anyone capable of this kind of work getting these results is undeniably intelligent, especially considering this involves total well-roundedness. Imagine 100 or so of these kids grouped together, taking more or less the same classes. ..It's discouraging. Yes, this is a fantastic sight, and yes, yay future, but.. you have to emphathize that there are some thoughts these kids are having. I think they have a lot to do with how a lot of these kids have emotionally attached themselves to their eduactional status for years, and the mixture of teenage hormones and realizing you're not the best is, well, brutal. Most people compete to win. If they know, or are inclined to think, that they can't win, why would they try? Losing isn't fun. I hope that clarified a little. It's kind of hard to express what I mean without.. coming off the wrong way. >_>