Guest Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 BRAINLESSNESS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ------------- ABBREVIATIONS - 0 WHOLESOMENESS - 0 CIRCUMSTANCES - 1 FANTASTICALLY - 3 MENINGOCOCCIC - 1 BRAINLESSNESS - 1 CONVERSATIONS - 0 MULTIVITAMINS - 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 confederacies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ------------- ABBREVIATIONS - 0 WHOLESOMENESS - 0 CIRCUMSTANCES - 1 FANTASTICALLY - 3 MENINGOCOCCIC - 1 BRAINLESSNESS - 1 CONVERSATIONS - 0 CONFEDERACIES - 2 MULTIVITAMINS - 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ????n???????? Since: MENINGOCOCCIC - 1 BRAInLESSNESS - 1 CONVERSATIONS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 Sorry Bong...the logic doesn't work. You could have said (eg) ??????????C?? as circumstanCes - 1 meningococCic - 1 multivitamIns - 0 And that doesn't hold true either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 CONFIDINGNESS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ------------- ABBREVIATIONS - 0 WHOLESOMENESS - 0 CIRCUMSTANCES - 1 FANTASTICALLY - 3 MENINGOCOCCIC - 1 BRAINLESSNESS - 1 CONVERSATIONS - 0 CONFEDERACIES - 2 MULTIVITAMINS - 0 CONFIDINGNESS - 0 What a yukky word Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 PARAPHERNALIA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 PARAPHERNALIA ABBREVIATIONS - 0 WHOLESOMENESS - 0 CIRCUMSTANCES - 1 FANTASTICALLY - 3 MENINGOCOCCIC - 1 BRAINLESSNESS - 1 CONVERSATIONS - 0 CONFEDERACIES - 2 MULTIVITAMINS - 0 CONFIDINGNESS - 0 Yay Thalia +10 , FP +10 WombatBreath: 95 JDave: 77 Thalia: 62 Shadow7: 20 fabpig: 25 curr3nt: 15 Over to you, Thalia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ??? Yes. Only 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaryan Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 ONE or TWO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??? ONE - 0 TWO - 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 OWE - ? As OnE=0 only W can score so if score is 1 then ?W? is proven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 FLO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??? ONE - 0 TWO - 1 OWE - 0 FLO - 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??o Since Flo and two each got 1 and share the letter O. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabpig Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??o Since Flo and two each got 1 and share the letter O. But if the word was (eg) TLC then TWO = 1 & FLO = 1 would also be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) ??o Since Flo and two each got 1 and share the letter O. As fabpig said, this logic doesn't work. Just because two words share a letter doesn't mean that letter is in the original word. You need to show why F and L can't be right or why T and W can't. For example, let's pretend that OWE-1 (It isn't but for the example. . .). ONE-0. There are a few ways you can show you proof. 1. Red lettering OWE - 1 ONE - 0 You show that because ONE-0, the O and E, which are in the same position in OWE cannot score. That leaves W as the only letter that can score. 2. Statement of change. The only change between OWE and ONE is the W-->N. Since there is a score change, from 1-->0, W is second. 3. Capital lettering OWE OnE-0 (showing that O and E can't score because ONE-0 I'm sure there are other ways of proving letters but I think these three are the most common. Edited July 4, 2011 by Thalia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaryan Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 TIN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 FLY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??? ONE - 0 TWO - 1 OWE - 0 FLO - 1 TIN - 0 FLY - 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ALL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalia Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) ??? ONE - 0 TWO - 1 OWE - 0 FLO - 1 TIN - 0 FLY - 0 ALL - 0 Edited July 4, 2011 by Thalia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 ??O Since: Fly - 0 Flo - 1 the y was the only thing that changed from flo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.