maurice_2.0

_ O _ _ _ MERGE - 0 EXTRA - 0 POINT - 1 EXIST - 0 JOINT - 1 PRINT - 0 +5 nana WORDS - 1 OOPSY - 1 TOOTH - 1

_ O _ _ _ MERGE - 0 EXTRA - 0 POINT - 1 EXIST - 0 JOINT - 1 PRINT - 0 +5 nana

_ _ _ _ _ MERGE - 0 EXTRA - 0 POINT - 1 EXIST - 0

_ _ _ _ _ MERGE - 0 EXTRA - 0 POINT - 1

Don't like this new merging... I have a word

How you figure

If somehow GRUNT = 3 then B is proven as from above RNT are proven and B or U must be. If GRUNT = 4 then U is proven as then G would be first. But from above B would have to be first. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand... Go

NT are proven. Changing BLUNT = 3 to BRUNT would yield 4 since R is known. But B and U can't both be since BRUIN = 2 with R known. So 1 and only 1 of B and U is correct, leaving R, N, T. GRUNT

BLUNT

ARTSY BRUIN

FRIED

CHASE If 0 then ENTER = 0 and CHASE = 0 means R is 2nd since ERASE = 1

CRATE

ERASE

PLOTS

PROOF ENTER

SCRUB AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0 WEANS - 0 +5 pg MARRY - 1 LYRIC - 1 STRAP - 2 STING - 1 SLING - 1 +5 nana SCRUB - 5 +20 nana I may or may not have seen the proof, but could definitely see where assumptions could have been made. Scores Nana - 145 Marksmanjay - 78 Maurice - 75 Araver - 38 Plainglazed - 25

_ _ R _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0 WEANS - 0 +5 pg MARRY - 1 LYRIC - 1 STRAP - 2 STING - 1 SLING - 1 don't see how anything is proven. I think only the if 0 is even true...

_ _ R _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0 WEANS - 0 +5 pg MARRY - 1 LYRIC - 1 STRAP - 2 STING - 1

_ _ R _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0 WEANS - 0 +5 pg MARRY - 1 LYRIC - 1 STRAP - 2

_ _ R _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0 WEANS - 0 +5 pg... +1 brownie point for on nana

_ _ _ _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0 WERNS - 1 BEANS - 0

_ _ _ _ _ AGAIN - 0 WORDS - 1 BEING - 0

_ _ _ _ _ Go

ZEBRA If 5 then