Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

dark_magician_92

Members
  • Posts

    393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by dark_magician_92

  1. If cubic equation x3 − Ax2 + Bx − C = 0 has roots a, b, c, then, expanding (x − a)(x − b)(x − c), we find

    A = a + b + c

    B = ab + bc + ca

    C = abc

    Then B = ab + bc + ca = ½ [(a + b + c)2 − (a2 + b2 + c2)] = 14.

    Hence a, b, c are roots of x3 − 6x2 + 14x − C = 0, and we have

    a3 − 6a2 + 14a − C = 0

    b3 − 6b2 + 14b − C = 0

    c3 − 6c2 + 14c − C = 0

    Adding, we have (a3 + b3 + c3) − 6(a2 + b2 + c2) + 14(a + b + c) − 3C = 5 − 6×8 + 14×6 − 3C = 0.

    Hence C = 41/3, and x3 − 6x2 + 14x − 41/3 = 0.

    Multiplying the polynomial by x, we have x4 − 6x3 + 14x2 − 41x/3 = 0. Then

    a4 − 6a3 + 14a2 − 41a/3 = 0

    b4 − 6b3 + 14b2 − 41b/3 = 0

    c4 − 6c3 + 14c2 − 41c/3 = 0

    Adding, we have (a4 + b4 + c4) − 6(a3 + b3 + c3) + 14(a2 + b2 + c2) − 41(a + b + c)/3 = 0.

    Hence a4 + b4 + c4 = 6×5 − 14×8 + (41/3)×6 = 0.

    That is, the sum of the fourth powers of the numbers is 0.

    With this method we find abc=41/3. Now if we expand (a+b+c)^4 as (a+b+c)^2*(a+b+c)^2, then we get a^4+b^4+c^4=24*abc-328, which on substituting abc becomes = 0.

  2. Male surnames are Foley and Hall who is not Tom:

    Tom Foley

    Bob Hall

    Alice is 2 or 3, but Alice=3 leads to Tom = Dallas = 4 which is not permitted.

    The other clues lead to two sets of possibilities:

    1 Je Lo Elkins Atlanta 1 Je Lo Elkins Atlanta

    2 Alice Dawes Chicago 2 Alice Girard Chi Sea

    3 Tom Foley StPaul 3 Tom Foley Chi StP Sea

    4 Je Lo Girard Dallas 4 Je Lo Dawes Dallas

    5 Bob Hall Seattle 5 Bob Hall Chi StP

    I don't see contradiction for any of the above remaining cases.

    The only way to distinguish Jean from Lois is that Jean does not go to Seattle.

    That clue does not seem to help since in any case she seems headed for Atlanta or Dallas

    If anyone can eliminate any of the above cases, feel free to carry it out to completion.

    If we try to find which place will the 5th person wants to go, then we find that as per Clue 1 - It can't be Seattle or St. Paul. As per Clue3 & 4 - Atlanta and Dallas respectively also can't be, then 5th person should go to Chicago.

  3. Interesting result!

    I don't solve cubics. I am retired, and I don't have to do things like that.

    Or Bayes formulas, at least until I learn to understand them.

    Newton-Raphson, on the other hand is a convenient and general

    sledge-hammer tool, and it's fairly simple to program.

    I did a manual search that convinced me the numbers

    are not integers, and they are not (all) real.

    NR tells me that are of the form

    a = real

    b = x + iy

    c = x - iy

    With values of

    a = 2.67770427706

    x = 1.66114786147

    y = 1.53116371279

    These values gave 6 8 and 5 for sums squares and cubes, within 10-8.

    The sum of their 4th powers? Zero!

    I found an alternative and interesting triplet that someone might want to solve.

    It may be quite easy because [white spoiler] a, x and y are all integers [/white spoiler].

    Hint: to see the spoiler, just select it.

    a + b + c = 4

    a2+ b2+ c2 = 4

    a3+ b3+ c3 = 4

    a4+ b4+ c4 = ___?

    It appeared to me too that a,b,c all cant be real. If we could find the value of a*b*c, then the problem could be done. Can you please provide a link for newton raphson method (some easy explanation ;))

  4. 11.0527 tons?

    Did we write our decimals out of order? Because I got 11.05727... The difference is small though so I will still give you best answer.

    90% of 110% of any number n is (.90)(1.10)(n) = 0.99 n . Same goes for 110% of 90%. So each year the elephants lose 1%; we multiply by 0.99 ten times, and we get (if n = orig. wt):
    ((0.99)^10) * n = 10 tons ;
    n = 10 / (0.99)^10
    = 10 / 0.904382075
    = 11.05727355 tons.

    I did the same way as you have done, its just that i thought if i am right, writing till only 3-4 decimal places would be sufficient..

    you got .0527 where i got .0572. So i wasn't sure if you used a different strategy or inverted your numbers

    Whoops, sorry. I mistyped.

  5. 11.0527 tons?

    Did we write our decimals out of order? Because I got 11.05727... The difference is small though so I will still give you best answer.

    90% of 110% of any number n is (.90)(1.10)(n) = 0.99 n . Same goes for 110% of 90%. So each year the elephants lose 1%; we multiply by 0.99 ten times, and we get (if n = orig. wt):
    ((0.99)^10) * n = 10 tons ;
    n = 10 / (0.99)^10
    = 10 / 0.904382075
    = 11.05727355 tons.

    I did the same way as you have done, its just that i thought if i am right, writing till only 3-4 decimal places would be sufficient..

×
×
  • Create New...