dark_magician_92
-
Posts
393 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by dark_magician_92
-
-
What if the question was, no. of ways you can form a ring with the balls?
-
If cubic equation x3 − Ax2 + Bx − C = 0 has roots a, b, c, then, expanding (x − a)(x − b)(x − c), we find
A = a + b + c
B = ab + bc + ca
C = abc
Then B = ab + bc + ca = ½ [(a + b + c)2 − (a2 + b2 + c2)] = 14.
Hence a, b, c are roots of x3 − 6x2 + 14x − C = 0, and we have
a3 − 6a2 + 14a − C = 0
b3 − 6b2 + 14b − C = 0
c3 − 6c2 + 14c − C = 0
Adding, we have (a3 + b3 + c3) − 6(a2 + b2 + c2) + 14(a + b + c) − 3C = 5 − 6×8 + 14×6 − 3C = 0.
Hence C = 41/3, and x3 − 6x2 + 14x − 41/3 = 0.
Multiplying the polynomial by x, we have x4 − 6x3 + 14x2 − 41x/3 = 0. Then
a4 − 6a3 + 14a2 − 41a/3 = 0
b4 − 6b3 + 14b2 − 41b/3 = 0
c4 − 6c3 + 14c2 − 41c/3 = 0
Adding, we have (a4 + b4 + c4) − 6(a3 + b3 + c3) + 14(a2 + b2 + c2) − 41(a + b + c)/3 = 0.
Hence a4 + b4 + c4 = 6×5 − 14×8 + (41/3)×6 = 0.
That is, the sum of the fourth powers of the numbers is 0.
With this method we find abc=41/3. Now if we expand (a+b+c)^4 as (a+b+c)^2*(a+b+c)^2, then we get a^4+b^4+c^4=24*abc-328, which on substituting abc becomes = 0.
-
Male surnames are Foley and Hall who is not Tom:
Tom Foley
Bob Hall
Alice is 2 or 3, but Alice=3 leads to Tom = Dallas = 4 which is not permitted.
The other clues lead to two sets of possibilities:
1 Je Lo Elkins Atlanta 1 Je Lo Elkins Atlanta
2 Alice Dawes Chicago 2 Alice Girard Chi Sea
3 Tom Foley StPaul 3 Tom Foley Chi StP Sea
4 Je Lo Girard Dallas 4 Je Lo Dawes Dallas
5 Bob Hall Seattle 5 Bob Hall Chi StP
I don't see contradiction for any of the above remaining cases.
The only way to distinguish Jean from Lois is that Jean does not go to Seattle.
That clue does not seem to help since in any case she seems headed for Atlanta or Dallas
If anyone can eliminate any of the above cases, feel free to carry it out to completion.
If we try to find which place will the 5th person wants to go, then we find that as per Clue 1 - It can't be Seattle or St. Paul. As per Clue3 & 4 - Atlanta and Dallas respectively also can't be, then 5th person should go to Chicago.
-
The balls are identical in size.Are the balls identical? If not, i think this should work, though not sure.
8C4 / 12C4
My answer was wrong, anyhow. WIll give a shot soon.
-
Are the balls identical? If not, i think this should work, though not sure.
8C4 / 12C4
-
Interesting result!
I don't solve cubics. I am retired, and I don't have to do things like that.
Or Bayes formulas, at least until I learn to understand them.
Newton-Raphson, on the other hand is a convenient and general
sledge-hammer tool, and it's fairly simple to program.
I did a manual search that convinced me the numbers
are not integers, and they are not (all) real.
NR tells me that are of the form
a = real
b = x + iy
c = x - iy
With values of
a = 2.67770427706
x = 1.66114786147
y = 1.53116371279
These values gave 6 8 and 5 for sums squares and cubes, within 10-8.
The sum of their 4th powers? Zero!
I found an alternative and interesting triplet that someone might want to solve.
It may be quite easy because [white spoiler] a, x and y are all integers [/white spoiler].
Hint: to see the spoiler, just select it.
a + b + c = 4
a2+ b2+ c2 = 4
a3+ b3+ c3 = 4
a4+ b4+ c4 = ___?
It appeared to me too that a,b,c all cant be real. If we could find the value of a*b*c, then the problem could be done. Can you please provide a link for newton raphson method (some easy explanation )
-
I couldn't figure out 'I' but most probably F, which is 95, is the largest.
G is 93, and the 2nd largest. H can have multiple values but all less than F. -
-
I am getting
Alice Dawes Seattle - 2nd
Tom Foley St. Paul - 3rd
Bob Hall Chicago - 5th
Lois and Jean can be interchanged - The one who is given Elkins surname goes to Atlanta and is 1st in row, the other goes to Dallas and is 4th in row. -
Any Hint for me?
-
I cheated; with less than 6 million different starting combinations, I wrote some code to brute force the answer.
1
8 45
21
Lasted for 12 iterations (possibly 11 or 13, counting isn't my strong suit )
Can you share the code?
-
36 times e i.e. e^36, multiplied by e^(100-36*e)
The product would be = e^100/e -
11.0527 tons?
Did we write our decimals out of order? Because I got 11.05727... The difference is small though so I will still give you best answer.
90% of 110% of any number n is (.90)(1.10)(n) = 0.99 n . Same goes for 110% of 90%. So each year the elephants lose 1%; we multiply by 0.99 ten times, and we get (if n = orig. wt):((0.99)^10) * n = 10 tons ;n = 10 / (0.99)^10= 10 / 0.904382075= 11.05727355 tons.I did the same way as you have done, its just that i thought if i am right, writing till only 3-4 decimal places would be sufficient..
you got .0527 where i got .0572. So i wasn't sure if you used a different strategy or inverted your numbers
Whoops, sorry. I mistyped.
-
11.0527 tons?
Did we write our decimals out of order? Because I got 11.05727... The difference is small though so I will still give you best answer.
90% of 110% of any number n is (.90)(1.10)(n) = 0.99 n . Same goes for 110% of 90%. So each year the elephants lose 1%; we multiply by 0.99 ten times, and we get (if n = orig. wt):((0.99)^10) * n = 10 tons ;n = 10 / (0.99)^10= 10 / 0.904382075= 11.05727355 tons.I did the same way as you have done, its just that i thought if i am right, writing till only 3-4 decimal places would be sufficient..
-
@brahmaraj - I may be wrong but i think there is mistake in your calculation, our answers are coming same.
-
11.0527 tons?
-
^ On secons thought, post 3 may not be right.
-
Further
This is just a guess, since Jen's 1st statement was enough for Ben to determine the numbers, i think, the number of ways 2 integers can be multiplied to get the area, should be only 2, if we apply the constraint that L+W<100.
-
Let me do a bonanova -
For starters
L ans W both can't be prime numbers, otherwise Ben could easily find out the values of L & W.
-
Agree with Superprismatic. I think u have counted (1, 2*10^250-1) also.
-
Bob - Betty - Larson - Jennifer
Jim - Susan - Jacobs - Ann
Gary - Judy - Miller - Andrew
Chuck - Mary - Smith - Jason
Tom - Carol - Thompson - Richard
George - Trudy - Wilson - Jane and Amy -
above poster seems right. It is not right to write f(x)=x+x+x+.....(x times) as x is a variable, so the number of times x comes is also not defined, till we give x a value.
-
-
Ok thanks. I didnt realise expected value may be a fraction.
A boy playing with his balls
in New Logic/Math Puzzles
Posted
all identical except colour. 8 blue, 4 red