dark_magician_92
-
Posts
393 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by dark_magician_92
-
-
yep! kudos
cool buddy, well done that replacement of x by z was very well thought
-
That's what intuition may tell you, but not true. Try it with sqrt(2).
sqrt(2) = 1.414214
sqrt(2)^sqrt(2) = 1.632527
sqrt(2)^ 1.632527 = 1.76084
sqrt(2)^1.76084 = 1.840911
keep going and it converges on 2.
However sqrt(2) isn't quite the limit, you can go higher yet. (But not so high as sqrt(e) which was k-man's last guess)
sqrt(e) = e^(1/2) is too high, it doesn't work. You're getting warmer though
y = x^(x^(x^(...
ln(y) = x^(x^(x..)))))..) * ln(x) = y * ln(x)
so we have
ln(y) = y*ln(x)
now take the derivative with respect to x:
(dy/dx) / y = (dy/dx)*ln(x) + y/x
from here it's just algebra:
-y/x = (dy/dx) * (ln(x) - 1/y)
(dy/dx) = -y / ( x*(ln(x) - 1/y) )
f ' (x) = -f(x) / (xlnx - x/f(x))
which is the same as:
f ' (x) = f(x)^2 / (x - x*ln(x)*f(x) )
ya i got f'(x) by doing it implicitly but like k-man, my intuition tells me sqrt(2) might work and tend to be finite, are u sure about d answer?
in New Logic/Math Puzzles
Posted
sorry anza, but i dint get what we have to do in the question