Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
![]() |
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |
A society that prizes girls
Best Answer bonanova, 21 February 2013 - 04:23 AM
Spoiler for Think bonanova and prime are correct
Since it's solved, I won't spoiler this.
The answer is not complex. Every birth, regardless of anything that is said, done, legislated, prohibited, presupposed, calculated, imagined or hoped for, has equal chances of being a boy or girl.
If you flip a coin an odd number of times, then, yes, the number of heads and tails cannot be equal. But the question is for large numbers of conceptions and births - for a society - where, even though the numbers of boys and girls may not be exactly equal at every moment - each birth changes the running total - the chances of an excess of boys exactly equals the chances of an excess of girls. The question asks whether a birth control strategy can affect the society's overall gender balance in a systematic way. The answer is no, it can not.
No calculus needed. ![]()
#1
Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:30 AM
#2
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:14 AM
- Bertrand Russell
#3
Posted 20 February 2013 - 11:40 AM
#4
Posted 20 February 2013 - 01:40 PM
there is a 50% chance of having a boy or girl in this society since it wasn't implied. I should had stated it as being stacked in the favor of boys to make the ratio more fun, but oh well
Spoiler for reversal
Edited by BMAD, 20 February 2013 - 01:41 PM.
#5
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:02 PM
Some of what makes me me is real, some of what makes me me is imaginary...I guess I'm just complex. ;P
<3 BBC's Sherlock, the series and the man. "Smart is the new sexy."
Chromatic Witch links now on my 'About Me' page!
When life hands me lemons, I make invisible ink.
#6
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:08 PM
The number of people in the society is not specified either. I assume, there are n married couples.
Past prime, actually.
#7
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:35 PM
Oops, seems I messed up again.
Past prime, actually.
#8
Posted 20 February 2013 - 07:41 PM
- Bertrand Russell
#9
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:17 PM
Spoiler for Series are not my strong point...
The number of people in the society is not specified either. I assume, there are n married couples.
Spoiler for my calculation
I think there is a discrepancy with bonanova's answer because...
#10
Posted 20 February 2013 - 09:18 PM
Past prime, actually.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






