rookie1ja Posted March 30, 2007 Report Share Posted March 30, 2007 Twins - Back to the Logic Puzzles Two girls are born to the same mother, on the same day, at the same time (Edit: of course, not both at once - one right after the other - you know what I mean ), in the same month and year and yet they're not twins. How can this be? This old topic is locked since it was answered many times. You can check solution in the Spoiler below. Pls visit New Puzzles section to see always fresh brain teasers. Twins - solution The two babies are two of a set of triplets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 16, 2007 Report Share Posted May 16, 2007 Can't we say that that the two babies were born in different months of the same year (like one born in Jan, the other in Dec) as the question doesn't specify anything about the months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rookie1ja Posted May 16, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2007 Can't we say that that the two babies were born in different months of the same year (like one born in Jan, the other in Dec) as the question doesn't specify anything about the months. Riddle amended - "months" added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 Or they could've both been born in the year of the rat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 6, 2007 Report Share Posted June 6, 2007 this is a classic riddle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 I'm going to have to be a stickler here... Unless a C-section happened, this is impossible. Two people cannot be born at the exact same time from the same mother. I happen to know triplets, and they are all about 8 minutes apart. Just being picky, I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2007 Report Share Posted June 7, 2007 They could also not be human-- if they were puppies for example, you wouldn't consider them twins. Not as elegant as the actual solution, but it's still a solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 Easy! The woman was impregnated by two different men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 Maybe she had two uteruses.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 They are Triplets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 couldn't the mother be a dog or a cat or some other animal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 I figured adoption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 couldn't you still say that AB are twins AC are twins and BC are twins? ABC are triplets, but separate, AB can still be considered twins, right? maybe not, i'm just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 your logic is correct but that becomes a completely different argument. but yea, definately not likely to be born at the exact same time, same day and year with same mother is enough, the time element falsifies the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 The mother was a dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Maybe one of them had a very noticable mole on her face? I dont think that would make them any less of twins though... haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 They were fertilized in-vitro and have different sets of parents? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 3, 2007 Report Share Posted July 3, 2007 If one child passes away, are they still called "triplets", or would you then refer to them as "twins"? I think two of the children could still be referred to as twins even if they part of a triplet set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 10, 2007 Report Share Posted July 10, 2007 couple of things... I guess I am reading into this too far 1. can't be born at same time 2. no mention of human or not 3. a little farther out there - no mention of demensions sorry spent some time on this and settled on # 2 (thought was a dog) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 13, 2007 Report Share Posted July 13, 2007 Can't we say that that the two babies were born in different months of the same year (like one born in Jan, the other in Dec) as the question doesn't specify anything about the months. Reply It does say in the same month Two girls are born to the same mother, on the same day, at the same time, in the same month and year and yet they're not twins. How can this be? Sorry to blow up your thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 they took an egg from her and cloned her at the same time the clone was pregnant so ... when she gave birth, the clone was also allowed out of the growing vat and thus "born" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 19, 2007 Report Share Posted July 19, 2007 2 OUTOF 3, TRIPLETS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 Can't we say that that the two babies were born in different months of the same year (like one born in Jan, the other in Dec) as the question doesn't specify anything about the months. Reply It does say in the same month Two girls are born to the same mother, on the same day, at the same time, in the same month and year and yet they're not twins. How can this be? Sorry to blow up your thought Sorry, Todaysdiscountdeals (yesterdays inflated price perhaps, actually you are not blowing anyone's "thought" but your own and only showing your lack of proofreading abilities! If you look carefully you will see that rookie1ja clearly acknowledges pranavojha's point and states that the question has been amended in light of pranavojha's comment!!! So pranavojha's was spot-on Can't we say that that the two babies were born in different months of the same year (like one born in Jan, the other in Dec) as the question doesn't specify anything about the months. Riddle amended - "months" added. Perhaps in future you should think before you leap in with both feet to find fault with others!!! Just a thought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 Twins - Back to the Logic Puzzles Two girls are born to the same mother, on the same day, at the same time, in the same month and year and yet they're not twins. How can this be? Twins - solution The two babies are two of a set of triplets. It is conceiveable that this could happen and the babies be born at exactly the "same time" without the trick trip up of it being triplets or quads or cat/dog or whatever. If say two eggs were fertilised (or one fertilised egg split into two) and one egg became absorbed and part of the internal body of the other embryo, then it is possible that a baby would be born with another baby within it and these would be born to the same mother, on the same day at the same time in the same month and year and yet not be classed as "twins". This has happened in reality but obviously the absorbed baby is no longer a living entity! See this link for an example of such a case: <!-- m --><a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/82927/baby_inside_a_man/" target="_blank">http://www.metacafe.com/watch/82927/baby_inside_a_man/</a><!-- m --> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 I know its a long shot but obviously there has to be some type of answer so here is my solution: The second child is adopted... The birth mother was giving birth to one child while the other was giving birth "same time" also it would be said the the child was born to the same mother. Even though it would be a very very very very rare and meraculous coincedence it is possible! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts