BMAD Posted June 1, 2013 Report Share Posted June 1, 2013 Herman knows how old he is turning this birthday; you don't. He is as many years old as the largest number of divisors of any integer N less than or equal to 20,000. How old is Herman turning, and what's the smallest such N? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Barcallica Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 for some reason my factors is half of yours but even still i am finding a higher divisible number N= 13860, Herman turning 144?? Maybe I understood wrong N=15120 and he is turning 80. seems more realistic. in my first answer it was 72 not 144. my mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Barcallica Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 N= 13860, Herman turning 144?? Maybe I understood wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 dark_magician_92 Posted June 3, 2013 Report Share Posted June 3, 2013 135? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 dark_magician_92 Posted June 3, 2013 Report Share Posted June 3, 2013 17640 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 BMAD Posted June 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2013 for some reason my factors is half of yours but even still i am finding a higher divisible number N= 13860, Herman turning 144?? Maybe I understood wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 dark_magician_92 Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 was the answer i posted, wrong? Age - 135, number-17640 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 BMAD Posted June 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 was the answer i posted, wrong? Age - 135, number-17640 yes. it was incorrect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 bonanova Posted June 5, 2013 Report Share Posted June 5, 2013 N=15120 and he is turning 80. seems more realistic. in my first answer it was 72 not 144. my mistake I agree with this solution. Nice puzzle. if n = Sum1r (piei) where pi are primes and ei are exponents, then f = Prod1r (ei+1) gives the number of factors of n and is maximized when the ei are largest. Thus, use the smallest r primes and ensure that ei are non-increasing. For any number N, we can write N = Sum1r (pixi) where xi assume real values. xi = [log N + Sum(log pi)]/[r + log pi] - 1. Use integer ei that are close to the real xi to maximize factors of n < N. This makes the search lightning fast, doable by hand. Here are the calculated xi and the best results for two, three and four primes: Primes xi ei n (factors) 2 3 5 7 11 13 > 3.86 2.07 1.09 .73 .40 .31 2 3 5 7 11 > 4.09 2.21 1.19 .81 .47 2 3 5 7 > 4.50 2.47 1.37 .96 4 3 1 1 gives 15120 (80) 2 3 5 > 5.40 3.04 1.76 7 3 1 gives 17280 (64) 2 3 > 7.44 4.32 9 3 gives 13824 (40) also 7 4 gives 10368 (40) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
BMAD
Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.