Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers
  • 0


sparkyboy6
 Share

Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

  Reveal hidden contents

or if the sphere was big enough, say the size of earth, then arcs would be negligible and you could just draw one at your feet and no one would be able to tell the difference

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/6/2010 at 9:52 PM, bonanova said:

  Reveal hidden contents

If by regular triangle you mean equal sides and angles but not necessarily straight sides.

Draw arcs of great circles among these three points:

.

  1. North Pole
  2. Equator at 0o longitude
  3. Equator at 90o longitude
    .

Say we said that the triangle had to be 2-D

We couldn't unless the sphere was crazy large and one point on it could somehow fit three points, which connected to create a triangle...

I'd agree with Dragoon on this one if the triangle is 2-D, and BN if the triangle could have depth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/6/2010 at 9:52 PM, bonanova said:

  Reveal hidden contents

If by regular triangle you mean equal sides and angles but not necessarily straight sides.

Draw arcs of great circles among these three points:

.

  1. North Pole
  2. Equator at 0o longitude
  3. Equator at 90o longitude
    .

One would assume that "regular" implied interior angles totaling 180 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 2:42 AM, peace*out said:

Say we said that the triangle had to be 2-D

We couldn't unless the sphere was crazy large and one point on it could somehow fit three points, which connected to create a triangle...

I'd agree with Dragoon on this one if the triangle is 2-D, and BN if the triangle could have depth...

Thanks for your support, but please amplify on "could have depth"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 3:53 AM, Dragoon said:

Thanks for your support, but please amplify on "could have depth"

  Reveal hidden contents

**Please tell me if im wrong - this is jsut my thinking...

what i meant originally was that it the triangle was on a sphere, the corners and lines would be at different points. (i dont have paint on this comp, so i cant really explain it visually but...) the sphere as a 3D object has depth. it is 3D - Length, height and depth. A sphere is made up of many different points (thanks Intro to D&D) and the general idea of a sphere is a 3D circle. If the edge of a circle is like a parenthisee --> ( , then not all parts of the triangle would be at the same point lining up...the lines would be curved. Does that make any sence?

Rethinking it, i think that the answer is "No."

A sphere is made up of many points. You could have three points be in the same plane but not the lines. A triangle is a polygon. The meaning of polygon is "many sided." (I know that this is not the exact definition, but the criteria fits -->) A polygon is a shape without any curves or open sides or crossing likes. Ex: this is not a polygon: D U O L M N H Z. The triangle in side A is, but not the "A" itself, because the sides are open...

A sphere is made up of many points.

^^ There's three definitions to work with, and unless i missunderstood, the surface of a sphere is curved. Which means the lines of a the triangle cant be strait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 3:38 AM, Dragoon said:

One would assume that "regular" implied interior angles totaling 180 degrees.

In geometry, "regular" has a particular meaning with regard to polygons: equal length sides and angles.

With that meaning, for example, regular rectangle refers to a square.

.

  1. There is a geometry of the plane, denoted as plane geometry or Euclidean geometry.
    The interior angles of all Plane triangles, regular or not, sum to 180o.
    .
  2. There is a geometry of the sphere denoted as spherical geometry.
    The interior angles of Spherical triangles sum to a value between 180o and 540o.
    .
  3. There is also a hyperbolic geometry.
    The interior angles of Hyperbolic triangle sum to a positive value less than 180o.
    .
The OP did not specify that the triangle was be a plane triangle, nor could it, sensibly.

As peace*out notes, on the surface of a sphere no plane figure can be drawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 10:19 AM, bonanova said:

In geometry, "regular" has a particular meaning with regard to polygons: equal length sides and angles.

With that meaning, for example, regular rectangle refers to a square.

.

  1. There is a geometry of the plane, denoted as plane geometry or Euclidean geometry.
    The interior angles of all Plane triangles, regular or not, sum to 180o.
    .
  2. There is a geometry of the sphere denoted as spherical geometry.
    The interior angles of Spherical triangles sum to a value between 180o and 540o.
    .
  3. There is also a hyperbolic geometry.
    The interior angles of Hyperbolic triangle sum to a positive value less than 180o.
    .
The OP did not specify that the triangle was be a plane triangle, nor could it, sensibly.

As peace*out notes, on the surface of a sphere no plane figure can be drawn.

Right, can you draw a 180* triangle on a sphere the size of a tennis ball?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 11:06 AM, sparkyboy6 said:

Right, can you draw a 180* triangle on a sphere the size of a tennis ball?

Bonanova said the triangle on a sphere would be between 180 and 540 degrees. I THINK this means that the larger the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 180 degrees; the smaller the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 540 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 12:03 PM, pdqkemp said:

Bonanova said the triangle on a sphere would be between 180 and 540 degrees. I THINK this means that the larger the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 180 degrees; the smaller the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 540 degrees.

Ok, here's the question simplified. Would it be a triangle? :huh:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 1:06 PM, sparkyboy6 said:

Ok, here's the question simplified. Would it be a triangle? :huh:

Again - going completely by what Bonanova said, "YES". This would be a Spherical Triangle as defined in Spherical Geometry. In Spherical Geometry, a Spherical Triangle is a "normal" triangle.

If you posted this must follow the definitions in Euclidean Geometry, then of course the answer is "no".

See Bonanova's post for the links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 12:03 PM, pdqkemp said:

Bonanova said the triangle on a sphere would be between 180 and 540 degrees. I THINK this means that the larger the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 180 degrees; the smaller the sphere, the closer the triangle's angles would add up to 540 degrees.

The relative size of the triangle and sphere determines the angles.

More precisely, the solid angle subtended by the triangle is what matters.

On a sphere the size of the earth or the size of a marble, either one,

a triangle with vertices all on a great circle has a 540o sum,

for both the internal and external angles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/7/2010 at 9:31 PM, bonanova said:

The relative size of the triangle and sphere determines the angles.

More precisely, the solid angle subtended by the triangle is what matters.

On a sphere the size of the earth or the size of a marble, either one,

a triangle with vertices all on a great circle has a 540o sum,

for both the internal and external angles.

Ah....I'm fairly sure my wee brain gets it now! ;)

Thanks much for the further explaination, Bonanova! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Theoretically, yes.

  Reveal hidden contents

On a perfectly spherical planet, take out some paper and writing tool, and draw the triangle. As gravity is specific to points, however, there are probably no perfectly spherical planets, only elliptoid ones. Using this logic, the actual answer is no. Nowhere did you say that I had to draw it onto the sphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree, in general, with the comments of peace*out and Bonanova, but I think you are still dealing with finite sheres. Once you expand the sphere to the infinite a regular triangle inscribed on the surface is bound to be regular. And peace*out, at the infinite would not the depth cease to exist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 11/8/2010 at 6:26 AM, Dragoon said:

I agree, in general, with the comments of peace*out and Bonanova, but I think you are still dealing with finite sheres. Once you expand the sphere to the infinite a regular triangle inscribed on the surface is bound to be regular. And peace*out, at the infinite would not the depth cease to exist?

true...

And to bonanova: me and my limited 9th grade mind hasn't learned yet that there are other kinds of triangles...Thank goodness I have geometry today :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...