Prof. Templeton

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation


About Prof. Templeton

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Fields

  • Gender
  1. This reminds me of a scooter trip I once took on these very boards where I learned a valuable lesson about head-starts.
  2. A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
  3. It was correctly included in the OP, just not the explanation.
  4. Quite small. The larger n is the smaller the chord length. I would argue that this is not an acceptable way to chose "random chords", however.
  5. After doing some research and none of the math, I've found
  6. could you explain how you got your answer?
  7. Just logged in from my home computer and yep, format is all screwy. Change theme did not help. Edit: Just changed to the IPS Test theme and that worked, but IP.Board does not.
  8. So, then it is more random. I looked up Jaynes' proposal and it based on the fact that the size of the circle is unknown, here the OP has given us a size. Is throwing straws at a circle a better method than selecting a number at random between 0 and πr2 , letting that number represent an area and drawing a chord to section off that area?
  9. I was just pointing out that Bertrand left out that method for choosing a chord. However,
  10. He left out from his three what I thought was the most intuitive way to make a chord
  11. I believe that does it. Thanks for hanging in there.
  12. Should we randomly chose the definition of random? I know our friend laid out three ways to draw a random chord while leaving out, arguably, the most intuitive way. I thought I remember reading that there were more ways than that even. Math is just a hobby for me so I am not immersed in it.
  13. I use Chrome. No problems.