Fun This bullet will never hit such armor, since they cannot coexist. Each one negates the other's very existence. Yes. The man drowns x times, is revived x times, until he either learn to swim, or grow gills... More seriously, one needs to define the "eternal life" granted, and perhaps how long will the fountain stands as it is. I accept half-heartedly. Oh, lookie here! A regular workday paradox! The girl comes from timeline a) and kills her grandma in timeline b) Since she could get to exist in timeline b) she can stay, slaughter her cousins, mate with her dad and go shopping with her kiddie b) version for all I care. Nothing whatsoever has changed in timeline a) if she's to go back there at the time of her earlier departure. The Weather Channel you describe are idiots. Make it "3.1416 as sunny" or a 'thousand times as stormy", that would hold as little meaning. Cold, hot, etc. are subjective. The statement lacks a base comparative: "We've gained two degrees compared to yesterday!" would be correct. Comparing numerical value is relevant, comparing scales is not. For instance, saying a Richter scale 6 earthquake is twice as dangerous as a scale 3 earthquake,would be similarly stupid. - Nyet, tovarish. - Sí, claro que sí. Nothing your eyes could see... Boring. Here's a more interesting one: What happens when you turn on a flashlight when you are in a car going the speed of light ? Wrong. Quod erat demonstrandum. I'll read that sentence as : "Can an omnipotent being create a stone that he is not able to lift ?" and replace 'omnipotent being" with 'Mickey Mouse". a) Mickey Mouse creates a stone. A regular stone is OK. A Daffy Duck statue is OK too. b) Mickey Mouse makes himself weaker until the stone is too heavy to lift. c) Mickey Mouse loses his virginity to Minnie, and renounces his impotency omnipotency. d) Mickey Mouse has henceforth created a stone he's not able to lift, and marries Minnie. (but yeah, he was able to lift it at some point, but at least that's a happy-ending story)