Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Posted 27 March 2008 - 04:16 PM
Posted 27 March 2008 - 04:27 PM
Spoiler for answer
Not correct ash. Not said in the original post but this had been suggested and was declines as an answer. No Stage play or Movie scenes allowed
Posted 27 March 2008 - 04:41 PM
And you said to exclude permission, legality - retraction required i thinkSpoiler for Solution
Posted 27 March 2008 - 08:59 PM
Posted 27 March 2008 - 09:07 PM
Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:14 PM
No TOPHAT, I meant in some countries they don't have the death penalty and some do. As well as euthenasia in some and not in others. I covered both as both fit the OP. Untill you said no legal killing was allowed - and then reintroduced it - that's playing a game me thinks - up to you how you want to post - free speech etc.
To Lost in space, What i was getting at with the legality issue is that if it was anyone else other than the hangman and his wife who was sentenced to death wife then it would be as normally know illegal for him to kill her but to say that would've given the game away when you mentioned permission you weren't talking of the wife being guilty or the situation the answer gives. You meant countries where women don't have rights and where a husband can fly into a rage beat her to death in public and not be touched.
Note you concluded what you thought I meant, that's ok- except you were wrong!
take a view of this information - was i wrong?
"gave the game away" when I was correct - up to you if you don't want to provide and answer till later, at least PM and say so, that wld be courtious.
Note that the OP is not full of information, which therefore means there will be a number of correct answers.
Only my wife is right even when she's wrong - in fact she's never more right than when she's wrong, but that's another story!
Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:39 PM
Posted 27 March 2008 - 10:42 PM
I never mentioned anything about legal killing i just said assume a country where it's not legal for a husband to kill his wife. therefoere the objebct becomes in such a country how is it possible for a huband to kill his wife without being accused of murder, that then brings you to the answer. Valid points again however it's not my riddle so i can't change the answer (http://www.riddles-o...ster-killer.htm) your euthenasia point was good and i got that but it a country where you can't legally kill your wife the question arises again how do you do it and the answer as a husband and hangman of a condemned prisoner
Can you please clarify the parts I emboldened? On another note, is emboldened the proper way to say that?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users