BMAD Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 What is the radius of the smallest circle that can enclose all 52 non-overlapping cards of an ordinary deck of playing cards? And what is the configuration of the cards? Assume the smaller dimension of the cards is 5 and the larger is 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 phil1882 Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 the best i can do a 6x5 rectangle, with an additional 6 on the top and bottom, and 5 left and right. gives a circle of radius 31.9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 Make 9 rows of cards with each row centered on the ones vertically adjacent to it: Row 1: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) Row 2: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 3: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 4: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 5: 10 cards abutted on their length 7 sides (row has length 50) Row 6: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 7: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 8: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 9: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) The radius of the smallest circle containing the cards is 25.9326. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 BMAD Posted September 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 Make 9 rows of cards with each row centered on the ones vertically adjacent to it: Row 1: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) Row 2: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 3: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 4: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 5: 10 cards abutted on their length 7 sides (row has length 50) Row 6: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 7: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 8: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 9: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) The radius of the smallest circle containing the cards is 25.9326. I would like to see what you mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 Make 9 rows of cards with each row centered on the ones vertically adjacent to it: Row 1: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) Row 2: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 3: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 4: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 5: 10 cards abutted on their length 7 sides (row has length 50) Row 6: 7 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 49) Row 7: 6 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 42) Row 8: 5 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 35) Row 9: 3 cards abutted on their length 5 sides (row has length 21) The radius of the smallest circle containing the cards is 25.9326. I would like to see what you mean. I wish I could make a picture of it, but I have never done anything like that. I've only used text. Perhaps a text picture will help. Each 5x7 card is represented by a 5x7 matrix containing 35 instances of a single digit. First and second rows: 111111122222223333333 111111122222223333333 111111122222223333333 111111122222223333333 111111122222223333333 44444445555555666666677777778888888 44444445555555666666677777778888888 44444445555555666666677777778888888 44444445555555666666677777778888888 44444445555555666666677777778888888 I can't do the third row because the next card would have half of its 7-long side having blank space above it, and the other half having half of card 4 above it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 phil1882 Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 here's a picture of superprismatics solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 here's a picture of superprismatics solution. cardscircle.JPG Thats a nice picture, phil That's a nice picture, phil. It's missing the two six-long rows (3rd & 7th). Would you add them? I'm impressed that you could do such a good job on the two rows closest to the middle row, as they are each 49 units long whereas the middle row is 50 -- making it difficult to center them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 phil1882 Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 sorry should have read closer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 BMAD Posted September 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 well done Phil. I was having a hard time visualizing what Superprismatic meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
BMAD
What is the radius of the smallest circle that can enclose all 52 non-overlapping cards of an ordinary deck of playing cards? And what is the configuration of the cards? Assume the smaller dimension of the cards is 5 and the larger is 7.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.