Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers
  • 0


Guest
 Share

Question

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Is it possible to have a negative speed?

If so, how? If not, why not?

Can't have a negative speed. Speed is the magnitude of the velocity. While velocity has direction as well as magnitude, it can be negative depending on the direction vector, but magnitude is always positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You can't, mostly 'cos of what Ken said. You can have deceleration though, which is measured as negative speed, but it's all relative.

Honestly, can you have negative anything? Maths aside, what is there I can have something negative of? Money doesn't count, as debt is essentially math anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Light ?

A burst through a fiber, met by an opposing 2nd pulse at hte other end - the second slows the other down (or is that just deceleration?) = negative speed.. I think ??

I may be way off - just trying to remember something from elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Honestly, can you have negative anything? Maths aside, what is there I can have something negative of? Money doesn't count, as debt is essentially math anyway.

The only truly negative thing that I can think of is a charge. Magnets, Electrons... Negative is very real.

Oh, and most anything that deals with government... the challenge with that is finding the positive :P

Edited by Brandonb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
The only truly negative thing that I can think of is a charge. Magnets, Electrons... Negative is very real.

Oh, forgot about those. We've not done much on magnetism in school, but when charges are said to be negative and positive, are they actually, or is it just like "This one has this type of charge, and this one has the opposite of that, so they must be positive and negative!"

Oh man, I think my brain just like, exploded. Do you know how illogical it is to think that we can have a negative charge? I mean, how is that measurable? It totally just stopped making sense to me. (This isn't to say I've stopped believing in it, but woah, brain ache.) Here's my attempt (mostly for myself) to make it make sense again...

Neutron = no charge (this is very easy to accept)

Proton = positive charge (taking this to mean a measurable, countable, charge. As in, "I have a positive amount of money" or "I have money that exists and can be measured)

Electron = .... Hey, probably not, but what if like, there's a 0, and there's really no such thing as negative and positive, just directions from 0? Not necessarily only two (as on a number line), but an infinite amount of directions? Negative and positive are just opposite directions, and it really has nothing to do with a number being below zero, just the absolute value from it? It makes it make sense! Sort of. To me anyway.

Someone should interject before I actually start believing what I just wrote. My head hurts. :blink::wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Oh, forgot about those. We've not done much on magnetism in school, but when charges are said to be negative and positive, are they actually, or is it just like "This one has this type of charge, and this one has the opposite of that, so they must be positive and negative!"

Oh man, I think my brain just like, exploded. Do you know how illogical it is to think that we can have a negative charge? I mean, how is that measurable? It totally just stopped making sense to me. (This isn't to say I've stopped believing in it, but woah, brain ache.) Here's my attempt (mostly for myself) to make it make sense again...

Neutron = no charge (this is very easy to accept)

Proton = positive charge (taking this to mean a measurable, countable, charge. As in, "I have a positive amount of money" or "I have money that exists and can be measured)

Electron = .... Hey, probably not, but what if like, there's a 0, and there's really no such thing as negative and positive, just directions from 0? Not necessarily only two (as on a number line), but an infinite amount of directions? Negative and positive are just opposite directions, and it really has nothing to do with a number being below zero, just the absolute value from it? It makes it make sense! Sort of. To me anyway.

Someone should interject before I actually start believing what I just wrote. My head hurts. :blink::wacko:

To save Izzy's head: :P

You are right in saying that we have assigned numerical meanings (positive and negative) to something which may not be numerical. Brandonb's example of magnetism is a good example as I remember it as north and south. Left and right work equally as well for electronic charge.

Negative numbers are used to help maths. 0 is an arbitrary point in many cases. Going back to the opening post, speed is regarded as a scalar quantity meaning that it has magnitute only. Velocity, however, is regarded as a vector quantity meaning that it has magnitute and direction. But, as pointed out already, direction in relation to what? Hence 0 being introduced in this scenario which then leads onto negative.

Oh, and most anything that deals with government... the challenge with that is finding the positive

I agree wholeheartedly (I used to work for the local government) :lol:

Edited by UKJon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
You can't, mostly 'cos of what Ken said. You can have deceleration though, which is measured as negative speed, but it's all relative.

Honestly, can you have negative anything? Maths aside, what is there I can have something negative of? Money doesn't count, as debt is essentially math anyway.

Deccelertion is negative acceleration not negative speed.

Both obviously representing rate of change of velocity.

I agree with you on the other bit negatives are short hand notation for direction that's all. even with money the "-" merely implies who owes whom. It's the same with magnetism, charge isn't precisely negative it's just short hand for how the fields will interact, the labels could easily be anything else for example electrochromodynamics uses "colour" and North and South are still used for poles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...