Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 Two combine to make a small-voiced third Against, not for; fool: rely on intellectual analysis of gathered data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 this is a little lame, but its what popped in my head first. equal sign (=) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 that's not it, but could be applied Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Fileobrother Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 subtraction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) subtraction. nope hee-hee I like being on the other side of a riddle Edited May 15, 2009 by chicory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 ooh, i like subraction, but maybeargument, (although those aren't really small voiced....) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) ooh, i like subraction, but maybeargument, (although those aren't really small voiced....) neither of those could change the punctuation--- maybe a colon after "third" and a semi-colon instead of a colon after "fool" Edited May 15, 2009 by chicory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 hypothesis ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 hypothesis ? one of the two often uses that.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 You don't mean, theories?one of the two often uses that.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I want to say anti somethingTwo combine to make a small-voiced third Against, not for; fool: rely on intellectual analysis of gathered data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 are u looking for three things in the answer? one's assertion, another's argument, their compromise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Fileobrother Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) counterintelligence? KGB!!! Edited May 15, 2009 by Fileobrother Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 You don't mean, theories? one of the two often also uses those Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 (edited) are u looking for three things in the answer? one's assertion, another's argument, their compromise thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis? that is clever but doesn't explain the fool the answer is a single word the first part works with both spelling and sound, but the second works only through spelling, the sound is different. Edited May 15, 2009 by chicory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 counterintelligence? KGB!!! Nice interpretation, but not mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 I want to say anti something close, for the first part! not quite it but consider the other word in that line... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 plainglazed Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 am groovin on thesecuckoo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 am groovin on thesecuckoo? nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 nope two words combine to make a 3rd word that 'still,small voice within' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 plainglazed Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 conflict?If so am still trying to justify the second syllabel so give me more time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 concious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 conflict?If so am still trying to justify the second syllabel so give me more time. halfway there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 mine was wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 concious? awfully close in sound (if not in meaning) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 plainglazed Posted May 15, 2009 Report Share Posted May 15, 2009 concise?no? tryin' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Guest
Two combine to make a small-voiced third
Against, not for; fool:
rely on intellectual analysis of gathered data.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
30 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.