bonanova Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 A list was born; the storm took its toll. Conversion claimed what survived. Lowly zero took out the trash. 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 9, 5, 1, 1, 0, 55, ___ Method, please, and use spoiler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted November 18, 2008 Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 9, 5, 1, 1, 0, 55, ___ 12 or I could say .. Spoiler for .............: i'll let others work ir out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 bonanova Posted November 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2008 Close, in one way of thinking, but ... no cigar yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Jiminy Cricket Posted November 19, 2008 Report Share Posted November 19, 2008 A list was born; the storm took its toll. Conversion claimed what survived. Lowly zero took out the trash. 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 9, 5, 1, 1, 0, 55, ___ Method, please, and use spoiler. I think...55. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 bonanova Posted November 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 I think...55. Kudos to JC. Anyone care to give the rationale? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted November 21, 2008 Report Share Posted November 21, 2008 Kudos to JC. Anyone care to give the rationale? I tried to hint with the long form but you discounted it - THIRTEEN - or 1 FOURTEEN - or 0 FIFTEEN - or 1 SIXTEEN - or 9 Im sure the penny will drop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 bonanova Posted November 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 I tried to hint with the long form but you discounted it - THIRTEEN - or 1 FOURTEEN - or 0 FIFTEEN - or 1 SIXTEEN - or 9 Im sure the penny will drop Right. I wasn't on your wavelength, and missed. Good one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Prof. Templeton Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 The english spelling of numbers contain Roman Numerals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 The english spelling of numbers contain Roman Numerals. So would the 66th number in the sequence be 18, 99, or 9-9? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Jiminy Cricket Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 So would the 66th number in the sequence be 18, 99, or 9-9? 0. Because taking ALL the Roman Numerals in order does not produce a VALID Roman Numeral. IXIX is not a valid Roman Numeral. 18 = XVIII 9 = IX 99 = IC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 The english spelling of numbers contain Roman Numerals.I see my hint was passed over - oh hum! 0. Because taking ALL the Roman Numerals in order does not produce a VALID Roman Numeral. IXIX is not a valid Roman Numeral. 18 = XVIII 9 = IX 99 = ICThink of it as algebra, or a sum that requires soloution Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
bonanova
A list was born; the storm took its toll.
Conversion claimed what survived.
Lowly zero took out the trash.
0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 9, 5, 1, 1, 0, 55, ___
Method, please, and use spoiler.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.