Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Under certain formula 53 is derived from 72 34 is derived from 53 25 is derived from 34 72>53>34>25>?>? what must come next in the series in place of '?'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 72>53>34>25>16>17 (add -19, -19, -9, -9, 1) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 16 ? If we break each number into two parts we have two sequence: 7,5,3,2,1 and second of (2,3,4,5,6 - ascending numbers) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 plainglazed Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 29? and then 85? (assumed the ">" are just meant to be "arrows" and not "greater than" ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Plainglazed you are absolutely correct !! :lol: but can you give explanation how you got it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted March 13, 2011 Report Share Posted March 13, 2011 (edited) Wow! How did you get 29 and 85? Edited March 13, 2011 by Perry the Platypus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Guest
Under certain formula
53 is derived from 72
34 is derived from 53
25 is derived from 34
72>53>34>25>?>?
what must come next in the series in place of '?'.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.