## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

# Rock in a Pond

### #1

Posted 30 January 2008 - 12:09 PM

By the way, the pond has no outlet or inlet which would affect the water level otherwise.

### #2

Posted 30 January 2008 - 12:25 PM

*The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.*

- Bertrand Russell

### #3

Posted 30 January 2008 - 02:48 PM

### #4

Posted 31 January 2008 - 06:11 AM

### #5

Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:19 PM

The water level decreases. Because, when the stone is in the boat, the larger surface area of boat displaces larger amount of water. which in turns results water level to rise relatively high (remember archimedis?). But when the stone is thrown into water causes a lower amount of water displacement.

Well, my understanding is that when an object is immersed in water (or any other fluid for that matter), the water rises to a height proportional to mass (or weight) of the object. Then my argument is it makes no difference whether the rock is immersed into the bottom of the water or it is being on the boat.

### #6

Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:55 PM

I think if you check, you'll find that water rises proportional to volume. When immersed, an object displaces the water by it's size (volume), not it's weight.Well, my understanding is that when an object is immersed in water (or any other fluid for that matter), the water rises to a height proportional to mass (or weight) of the object.

One way to look at this is by example: Consider a rock of 1 cubic meter inside of a boat. Since rock generally weighs roughly 3 times water, the weight of the cube is around 3 tons. Since a boat displaces it's weight in water, the amount of displacement added by the rock is 3 tons of water or 3000 liters.

When the rock is totally immersed in the water, it will displace exactly 1000 liters of water.

Therefore, when the rock is removed from the boat and put into the water, the pond level will fall by the amount equivalent to removing 2000 liters.

### #7

Posted 01 February 2008 - 10:35 PM

I think if you check, you'll find that water rises proportional to volume. When immersed, an object displaces the water by it's size (volume), not it's weight.

One way to look at this is by example: Consider a rock of 1 cubic meter inside of a boat. Since rock generally weighs roughly 3 times water, the weight of the cube is around 3 tons. Since a boat displaces it's weight in water, the amount of displacement added by the rock is 3 tons of water or 3000 liters.

When the rock is totally immersed in the water, it will displace exactly 1000 liters of water.

Therefore, when the rock is removed from the boat and put into the water, the pond level will fall by the amount equivalent to removing 2000 liters.

I 've got it now ... thanx

**Edited by brhan, 01 February 2008 - 10:35 PM.**

### #8

Posted 13 September 2012 - 07:32 AM

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users