Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers
  • 0


Guest
 Share

Question

Determine all possible nonzero real n satisfying n = [n]*{n}, such that 5*{n} - [n]/4 is an integer.

Note: [x] is the greatest integer <= x, and {x} = x -[x]

Edited by K Sengupta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Determine all possible nonzero real n satisfying n = [n]*{n}, such that 5*{n} - [n]/4 is an integer.

Note: [x] is the greatest integer <= x, and {x} = x -[x]

there are two: 2.5 and 10.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

as i understand it

it is impossilbe for all positive numbers. for negative numbers the n=[n]{n} is possible once for every whole number (meaning there is one number this happens for in -1 or -2 or ... The only negative number that satisfies the second condition that i see is -3.2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can you be more clear with your question. As I see the way others understood it there seem to be many many solutions:

[n] can be a multiple of 20 and {n} would then be any multiple of 0.2

[n] can be 10 and {n} can be 0.5

[n] can be 6 and {n} can be 0.3 etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

as i understand it

for negative numbers the n=[n]{n} is possible once for every whole number (meaning there is one number this happens for in -1 or -2 or ...

Nice analysis on the whole. But, [n] is the greatest integer <= n, and so n = [n] whenever n is an integer. In that situation if n is a nonzero negative integer then (n) = 0, so that the lhs of n = [n]*{n} is nonzero, but the rhs is zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can you be more clear with your question. As I see the way others understood it there seem to be many many solutions:

[n] can be a multiple of 20 and {n} would then be any multiple of 0.2

[n] can be 10 and {n} can be 0.5

[n] can be 6 and {n} can be 0.3 etc

The problem statement defines, [n] as the greatest integer <= n, and {n} = n -[n]. For example, the greatest integer <= -4.5 is -4, so: [-4.5] = -4 and {-4.5} = 0.5. Similarly, if n = 6.3, then [n]=6, and {n} = 0.3.

Also, if n is any integer, then n = [n], and {n} = 0.

If n= 10.5, then [n] = 10, and {n}= 0.5, and so:[n]*{n} = 5, which is not equal to 10.5, and therefore a contradiction.

The problem statement requires to find all real n that satisfy all the given conditions.

I hope this serves to clarify the fundamental tenets inclusive of the given problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

For example, the greatest integer <= -4.5 is -4, so: [-4.5] = -4 and {-4.5} = 0.5.

One small correction. This should read:

"For example, the greatest integer <= -4.5 is -5, so: [-4.5] = -5 and {-4.5} = 0.5."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i misscommunicated what i should have said is it happens once in between -1 and -2 once in between -2 and -3 and so on. The first time I was trying to say once with look of -1.****** once with -2.********* and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Determine all possible nonzero real n satisfying n = [n]*{n}, such that 5*{n} - [n]/4 is an integer.

Note: [x] is the greatest integer <= x, and {x} = x -[x]

If I understood the problem right, the only n is -3.2

There are infinitely many values of n that satisfy n = [n] * {n} - these are given by -i*i/(i+1) for any positive non zero integer i. 5*{n}-[n]/4=i*(i+21)/(4*(i+1)). To be an integer, only possibility is i = 4

Edited by logician
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Good question....

All numbers of the form.....

[x] = -4,-8,-12,.........

and

{x} = [x]/([x] - 1)

Nice analysis on the whole. But, [n] is the greatest integer <= n, and so n = [n] whenever n is any integer, giving:{n}= n- [n]= 0.

In that situation if n is a nonzero negative integer divisible by 4, then the first condition, that is n = [n]*{n}, is not satisfied, since the lhs is nonzero, but the rhs is zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Nice analysis on the whole. But, [n] is the greatest integer <= n, and so n = [n] whenever n is any integer, giving:{n}= n- [n]= 0.

In that situation if n is a nonzero negative integer divisible by 4, then the first condition, that is n = [n]*{n}, is not satisfied, since the lhs is nonzero, but the rhs is zero.

sorry i didn't get what u r saying......is my answer wrong????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

sorry i didn't get what u r saying......is my answer wrong????

Not exactly wrong, merely inaccurate. The problem statement requires two conditions to be satisfied, while your solution,that is, "All numbers of the form .[x] = -4,-8,-12,........." merely satisfies the second but fails to comply with the first due to obvious reasons.

However, {x} = [x]/([x] – 1 is a good starting point.

To clarify further, [x] is simply the floor function, and: {x} = x – floor(x).

Edited by K Sengupta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Not exactly wrong, merely inaccurate. The problem statement requires two conditions to be satisfied, while your solution,that is, "All numbers of the form .[x] = -4,-8,-12,........." merely satisfies the second but fails to comply with the first due to obvious reasons.

However, {x} = [x]/([x] – 1 is a good starting point.

To clarify further, [x] is simply the floor function, and: {x} = x – floor(x).

[x] = -4

{x} = -4/-5 = 0.8

=> x = -3.2

[x]= -8

{x} = -8/-9 = 8/9

=> x = -64/9

.

.

.

and so on....

so where is x is zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

[x] = -4

{x} = -4/-5 = 0.8

=> x = -3.2

[x]= -8

{x} = -8/-9 = 8/9

=> x = -64/9

.

.

.

and so on....

Of the various solutions offered, only [x]= -4, {x} = 0.8, giving: x = -3.2 is valid.

A ready check will attest to the fact that the other multiple of 4 values of [x], that is: [x] = -12, -16, ……and so on, with: {x} = [x]/([x] -1) fail to satisfy the second condition.

For example, the solution x = -64/9, ([x]= -8, and {x} = 8/9) is inaccurate, and it fails to satisfy the second condition that:

5*{n} - [n]/4 is an integer, since:

(5*8)/9 + 8/4 = 58/9, which is not an integer.

...so where is x is zero.

I admit that misread the [x] in the answer in terms of post #12 as x, and hence the apparent confusion

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...