I've noticed a pattern on the new puzzle forum, and wanted to bring it forward for discussion.
It seems as if every time a confounding riddle is posted, especially if its difficulty stems from ambiguity of meaning in the riddle's phrasing, one or more people eventually guess that the answer to the riddle is God. Similarly, one of the other most common incorrect guesses I have seen on the forum is emotion. I think that, much like the phenomenon of bringing up Nazis as postulated by Godwin's Law, the longer a riddle goes unsolved, the more likely it is that someone will say "the answer is God."
The issues I would like to address are these:
1) Do you agree or disagree and your reasoning behind your response
2) What are the practical and philosophical implications of this? Does this correlation apply to questions other than riddles, or, in fact, any unanswerable question?
Question
Guest
I've noticed a pattern on the new puzzle forum, and wanted to bring it forward for discussion.
It seems as if every time a confounding riddle is posted, especially if its difficulty stems from ambiguity of meaning in the riddle's phrasing, one or more people eventually guess that the answer to the riddle is God. Similarly, one of the other most common incorrect guesses I have seen on the forum is emotion. I think that, much like the phenomenon of bringing up Nazis as postulated by Godwin's Law, the longer a riddle goes unsolved, the more likely it is that someone will say "the answer is God."
The issues I would like to address are these:
1) Do you agree or disagree and your reasoning behind your response
2) What are the practical and philosophical implications of this? Does this correlation apply to questions other than riddles, or, in fact, any unanswerable question?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.