Guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Determine all possible pair(s) (X, Y) of nonnegative integers that satisfy this equation. X2 + (X+1)2 = Y4 + (Y+1)4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Reveal hidden contents the trivial solution is x,y = 0,0. I'm not positive, but this may be the only solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Reveal hidden contents Since the function F(X,Y)=Y4+(Y+1)4-X2-(X+1)2 is a differentiable function of 2 variables, an extremum point can be found in the usual way by taking partials, setting them to 0, and solving. One must also check boundary points which in this case is (X,Y)=(0,0). Doing this, we find that F(X,Y) is minimal at only the boundary point. There are other candidates from doing the partial derivatives, but they are not non-negative integers. So, (0,0) is the only solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Reveal hidden contents i checked up to 100,000, as far as i can tell there is no other solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 On 10/6/2009 at 7:47 PM, superprismatic said: Reveal hidden contents Since the function F(X,Y)=Y4+(Y+1)4-X2-(X+1)2 is a differentiable function of 2 variables, an extremum point can be found in the usual way by taking partials, setting them to 0, and solving. One must also check boundary points which in this case is (X,Y)=(0,0). Doing this, we find that F(X,Y) is minimal at only the boundary point. There are other candidates from doing the partial derivatives, but they are not non-negative integers. So, (0,0) is the only solution. Reveal hidden contents Well, I forgot to actually check the extremum candidate from the partials. It would have to make F(X,Y) greater than 0 for my remarks to make sense, i.e. for the solution over the reals to be no better than the boundary candidate. As it is, the candidate from the partials makes F(X,Y) take its smallest value of -3/8 at (-1/2,-1/2). So, my previous post is incorrect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 superprismatic Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 On 10/6/2009 at 8:01 PM, phillip1882 said: Reveal hidden contents i checked up to 100,000, as far as i can tell there is no other solution. Reveal hidden contents Did you check to see what's the closest you got to a solution, i.e., what is the closest the right and left hand sides got to each other? It would be interesting to know! If you got as close as 1 or 2 or so, you may not have gone out far enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 Reveal hidden contents just checked and the greater the y the less close x can get as far as i can tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 Reveal hidden contents I too think (0,0) is the only solution. The given expression can be re-written as: (X - Y2).(X + Y2) = - ((X - Y2) - 2.Y).((X + Y2) + 2Y + 2) Since signs on both sides need to be the same, and since X and Y themselves are positive, we have two conditions (ignoring the said solution where both sides are zero): Both sides are positive sign: => X > Y2 (and, also, X < Y2 + 2.Y, but that doesn't matter) Both sides are negative sign: => X < Y2 (to make L.H.S negative). But this would imply that the R.H.S will become positive. So this is an impossible condition. But if, X > Y2, the original equality can't be satisfied. So no other solutions are possible Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 7, 2009 Report Share Posted October 7, 2009 On 10/6/2009 at 6:12 PM, K Sengupta said: Determine all possible pair(s) (X, Y) of nonnegative integers that satisfy this equation. X2 + (X+1)2 = Y4 + (Y+1)4 Reveal hidden contents X2 + (X+1)2 = Y4 + (Y+1)4 2X2 + 2X + 1 = 2Y4 + 4Y3 + 6Y2 + 4Y +1 2X2 + 2X + 1 - 1 = 2Y4 + 4Y3 + 6Y2 + 4Y 2X (X +1) = 2Y (Y3 + 2Y2 + 3Y + 2) 2X (X +1) = 2Y (Y+1)(Y2 + Y + 2) so your only solutions for X are {0,-1} and Y {0,-1, and some rational} the only non-neg integer solution for (X,Y) is (0,0) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 I'm sorry but I think 'methinks' and 'Perigren' made mistakes in their proofs. Ok here is why and my 2 cents: Reveal hidden contents first i agree with you 'methinks' up until you say "But if, X > Y2, the original equality can't be satisfied." because the way I see it, X must be > Y2. basically expand the right side of the equation and you have: 2X2 + 2X + 1 = 2Y4 + 4Y3 + 6Y2 + 4Y +1 and now sub Y2 in for X and you have: 2Y4 + 2Y2 + 1 = 2Y4 + 4Y3 + 6Y2 + 4Y +1 and you can plainly see that the left side is too small, so X must be > Y2 next, I like what you did 'Perigren' up until the end and then it looks like you solved each side being=0, but there is no reason to think that. however, if I can start at your end point: 2X (X +1) = 2Y (Y+1)(Y2 + Y + 2) and rearrange the right hand side: X (X +1) = Y(Y+1) (Y(Y + 1) + 2) now define a = Y(Y+1) and you have: X (X +1) = a (a+2) but there is no (positive) integers solution for X and a ahhhh, now I feel better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Guest
Determine all possible pair(s) (X, Y) of nonnegative integers that satisfy this equation.
X2 + (X+1)2 = Y4 + (Y+1)4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.