curr3nt
-
Posts
2840 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by curr3nt
-
1. No. Hosts have said Baddie NK says Harry but isn't controlled by person. (paraphrased) 2. Yes. 3. No. Thalia was blocked. She *could* be Voldemort unless Voldemort choose not to act. Goodie killing goodie from lack of info serves the baddie interest. Any player with an action can choose not to use it. 4. No. Filch could be certain depending on who they picked. Voldemort can't spy so they wouldn't know who anyone else is to be certain. Harry, Ron and Hermione know each other and by process of elimination know who is a goodie and therefore innocent. They just do not know the roles of the goodies. 5. Yes.
-
Wouldn't your suspecting me then make you worthy of suspect by your logic? Know what? Like you I'm suspicious of people who are suspicious of others. I'm also suspicious of people who aren't suspicious of others. What a fun game this is. If you aren't paranoid then you are playing it wrong.
-
and before the Advil comment is misunderstood as an attack. I bought some noise cancelling headphones and they are giving me a headache. Not sure if I'm going to keep trying to get used to them or give up. Sound is nice but if these headaches are going to be a result then forget it. So off topic but does anyone have experience with them and know if they will pass?
-
3rd - he, she, and they 2nd - you, your and yours 1st - I, me, we Since I wasn't talking to the baddies directly but talking about them as a group I believe 3rd person is correct. And I think I've been using goodie as more of an adjective or adverb then anything. If I'm talking theory I'm likely to use Baddie, Goodie and Indy all in 3rd person since I'm viewing it from outside a game. Are you going to attack my grammar more because if so I need to know. I hated English class and will likely need more time to respond. I need more Advil.
-
Looking up 3rd person to see if it means what I think it does...
-
Why does everyone imagine my tone of voice as being harsh or mean when they read what I write? Fine, odds are Thalia is a goodie. Her continuing to offer to give up her role means she is likely a vanilla goodie. Why do the baddies need to spy her now to find Voldemort, Filch and Chess? I was trying to get her to stop. I think it is too late to try to get them to think Thalia might be trying to fool them anyways. But in mafia no matter how much it might be something there is always WIFOM. (Some help would have been nice) I would have preferred the baddies have to spy more people. But with me replacing Shivam, two other inactive people and Thalia just about claiming a vanilla goodie. There is only so many other options for goodies with actions. They likely have a good idea who Chess and Filch might be. Would be nice if we can do a better job keeping Voldemort hidden. --- How can you wonder about me using baddies in the 3rd person and not goodie in the 3rd person? Which person should I be using when referring to the baddie group?
-
Do you realize what baddies having a spy means to the game play? Outing roles mean nothing without additional proof. Also, if you are a goodie you have told the baddies they do not need to waste a spy on you. Making it easier to find Voldemort. Unless that is what you want them to think which if so keep up the good work.
-
Yes OtherwiseOccupiedSmurf.
-
Did you bother reading anything else I wrote?
-
And all this came up because Thalia was offering to out herself when no one was voting for her at the time.
-
Baddies have two ways to be killed. Voldemort and voting. By spying a person they kill they eliminate a goodie, remove a possible role from suspect list and get insurance against a lynch. If they didn't spy Klue how'd they know Klue wasn't Voldemort and they are fine there? I do not know if they did or didn't I am just not going to believe anyone outing their role without other proof.
-
Look up Aaryan. Host said that baddies could have. They could have taken out Klue AND claim to be his role if needed.
-
And there are three people that haven't voted yet... Really dislike last minute surprise voters.
-
So baddies could know Klue's role and claim it. @Thalia - Outing your role is not going to count for much since we do not know who Hermione actually spied.
-
If Hermione AND Harry targeted Klue on N1 would the spy return a result?
-
You have to check with Shadow or does the question need to be clearer?
-
Those comments were more directed at TrUnX. I still haven't decided if it was a mistake on his part or calculated. And I can't tell if offering to out your role with no pressure on you is a noob move or calculated. Baddies might have spied Klue before killing him. Let's call your bluff. @Host - Would a spy return a result if the target was also killed? I do not know what tricks you all have picked up yet...
-
Waiting to see what Psychosmurf, Thalia and tSoRaL do.
-
And just noticed you tied up the votes to protect yourself...
-
Baddie Kill is the Baddies using their Kill to eliminate a goodie. Harry killing Kluemaster was the baddie kill. Goodie Kill is Voldemort/Quirrell killing someone. What Shadow was saying was: Nothing can stop Harry from killing someone. Wizard Chess will prevent Voldemort/Quirrell, Hermione and Filch. If the Voldemort/Quirrell or Harry targets Wizard Chess then Wizard Chess will die but not before they Block someone. If Harry kills Voldemort/Quirrell then Voldemort/Quirrell dies but not before they have a chance to kill someone else. ----- So weird calling Harry a baddie and Voldemort a goodie... Also...new people are so frustrating. I have no idea if you are as inexperienced as you seem. You responded quickly so do not think you were coached. gah...need to think.
-
Did you mean 67,11,9,81,79,11,9,81 instead of 67,11,9,81,79,119,81?
-
How is it obvious that Thalia is innocent? Even being blocked she could be Harry or Ron. She even went so far as to say that Ron wasn't really a threat. As long as any baddie is alive they can NK. As for experienced player you are countering her statement that she isn't one. Are you both baddies or are you the baddie trying to buddy up to her? I can't quite tell if her comments about Harry being blockable were innocent or misdirecting. Since she assumed he was blockable and likely wasn't expecting the host to answer without being asked in public first. On the other side, her defense came a bit fast with only one vote on her which would lead me to think she is still inexperienced. Neither of which answer why you are buddying up to her. If you were Filch and knew she was a goodie then you would know she has no info to lead you to Harry so why ask? If you are not Filch then how can you be so sure she is a goodie? That only leaves you as a baddie. Dumbledore: Shadow7 McGonagall: darth nox 1. Psychosmurf 2. Aaryan-voting for Q-Cumber 3. Thalia 4. Akriti - voting for Aaryan 5. Peace - voting for TrUnX 6. Q-Cumber - voting for the son of rage and love 7. KlueMaster-killed by the Baddies 8. the son of rage and love 9. Yodell - voting for Psychosmurf 10. TrUnX 11. Shivam curr3nt - voting for TrUnX Prove to me how Thalia is innocent because it isn't obvious to me. It is only suggestive...
-
Aaryan...there is no Hagrid in this game.
-
uhm...I need a bit to refresh my lore. Been so long since I read the books.
-
I think of the roles here only Ron and Hermione were prefects...