Guest Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 Fill in an answer that continues the patterns: (there may be more than one correct answer for each) A) 0111 01101111 1110 011011011111 0011111111111100 ? B) A L E J ? C) C L M ? D) AEIIEAAEI AEIA AEIEAEEI AEII AEAIA EAEIIEEAEE ? I'll post answers in a while if no one gets them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 These are quite difficult! Perhaps you could post a hint instead of the answers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 10, 2007 Report Share Posted August 10, 2007 Ok. Hints. Hmmm. I think hints give them away, but here goes. A) Hint: The pattern has nothing to do with the number or order of the 1's and 0's. What is left? Huge Hint: Ratio. Look at the ratio of 1's to 0's. B) Hint: Yo-yo's and primes. Huge Hint: If the alphabet were lined up from top to bottom and assigned normal numbers, like A=1 B=2, what happens to this sequence? C) Hint: Line up the alphabet over and over again with numbers until you hit 100. Like A= 1, 27, 53 & 79; B = 2, 28, 54 & 80, etc. Huge Hint: What is the distance from one letter to the next if you line them up and count the "numbers" descending from A=1? What would the next "number" be and it's corresponding letter? D) Hint: Again, has nothing to do with the number or order of the letters. What is left? Huge Hint: Ratio. Look at the ratio of letters. What would come next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Well, either nobody could get these or nobody wanted to post, so here are the answers as promised: Fill in an answer that continues the patterns: (there may be more than one correct answer for each) A) 0111 01101111 1110 011011011111 0011111111111100 ? The pattern uses ratios of 0 to 1. It goes 1:3, 1:3, 1:3, 1:3 -- Get it? Any answer of 0's and 1's in a 1:3 ratio is correct. B) A L E J ? This pattern uses a-z letters assigned numbers 1 - 26 where a =1 and z = 26. It uses prime numbers to "yo yo" from a. A to L = 11. L to E = 7. E to J = 5. So the next in line is 3 up from J, or G. C) C L M ? This pattern assigns numbers sequentially to A - Z repeating. The pattern is factors of 3 added to the one before, so 3=C, then 3 + 3*3 or 12=L, then 12+ 3*3*3 or 39 = M, so next is 39 + 3*3*3*3 or 39 + 81 = 120 which would = P D) AEIIEAAEI AEIA AEIEAEEI AEII AEAIA EAEIIEEAEE ? This again uses ratios. A to E to I. 1:1:1, then A 2:1, E 2:1, I 2:1, then A 3:1, E 3:1, so the next needs to be I 3:1. Any combination that has 3 I's for every one A and E works. For example, IIIAE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 The first and last aren't technically sequences In order for a proper sequence there nees to be defined parameters and rules in order to come up with a specific value or character. In these there were several answers that could be used as a possible answer , but what you could have done was actually have a sequence with a sequence. e.g. 0111 10111011 110111011101... then the next would definately be 1110111011101110 I did think that the 2nd and third sequences were very good though. I couldn't get them until the hints were given. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 The first and last aren't technically sequences In order for a proper sequence there nees to be defined parameters and rules in order to come up with a specific value or character. I respectfully disagree. The parameters DID exist to limit the responses to a finite set of answers, all with a common value or character. A ratio set is completely valid and particular enough to work as a sequence, most especially number 4 where the ratio was VERY specific in that it had to be 3:1 using a particular letter. I don't understand why you think a sequence must equal a finite answer set of 1. For example, if we are walking down a street playing a game where you are trying to figure out my pattern, and I point to a building, a bush, a person, another building, another bush, and then ask you complete it, you don't need to point to Mr. Henry standing at 42nd and J streets. You just need to point to something with enough common parameters to make the sequence valid - i.e. a human being, regardless of race, sex, etc. Now if I narrowed the parameters to include only males as a potential answer (for example if I had been alternating the gender of the people and it was now time for a male) then the appropriate set of answers would be limited to only males on the street. In A) there is a definite set of parameters in that you must use 0's and 1's and you must have a 3:1 ratio of 1's to 0's. Nothing else works, therefore any valid answer IS part of a valid sequence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 I respectfully disagree. The parameters DID exist to limit the responses to a finite set of answers, all with a common value or character. A ratio set is completely valid and particular enough to work as a sequence, most especially number 4 where the ratio was VERY specific in that it had to be 3:1 using a particular letter. I don't understand why you think a sequence must equal a finite answer set of 1. For example, if we are walking down a street playing a game where you are trying to figure out my pattern, and I point to a building, a bush, a person, another building, another bush, and then ask you complete it, you don't need to point to Mr. Henry standing at 42nd and J streets. You just need to point to something with enough common parameters to make the sequence valid - i.e. a human being, regardless of race, sex, etc. Now if I narrowed the parameters to include only males as a potential answer (for example if I had been alternating the gender of the people and it was now time for a male) then the appropriate set of answers would be limited to only males on the street. In A) there is a definite set of parameters in that you must use 0's and 1's and you must have a 3:1 ratio of 1's to 0's. Nothing else works, therefore any valid answer IS part of a valid sequence. With this logic, I could give you a "sequence" of random letters and ask you to give me the next one. Then, according to you, the answer would be ANY letter, so long as it was a letter. To ask for the "next" in the sequence, implies there is a unique solution. If you were to ask for an example that would fit the solution, would imply the answer must be within a set. In my example above, the "set" would be any letter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted April 7, 2008 Report Share Posted April 7, 2008 bugga to y'all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 I respectfully disagree. The parameters DID exist to limit the responses to a finite set of answers, all with a common value or character. A ratio set is completely valid and particular enough to work as a sequence, most especially number 4 where the ratio was VERY specific in that it had to be 3:1 using a particular letter. I don't understand why you think a sequence must equal a finite answer set of 1. For example, if we are walking down a street playing a game where you are trying to figure out my pattern, and I point to a building, a bush, a person, another building, another bush, and then ask you complete it, you don't need to point to Mr. Henry standing at 42nd and J streets. You just need to point to something with enough common parameters to make the sequence valid - i.e. a human being, regardless of race, sex, etc. Now if I narrowed the parameters to include only males as a potential answer (for example if I had been alternating the gender of the people and it was now time for a male) then the appropriate set of answers would be limited to only males on the street. In A) there is a definite set of parameters in that you must use 0's and 1's and you must have a 3:1 ratio of 1's to 0's. Nothing else works, therefore any valid answer IS part of a valid sequence. hm...don't you think that the number of variants in your first sequence will be infinite... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0 Guest Posted January 6, 2009 Report Share Posted January 6, 2009 Fill in an answer that continues the patterns I also agree that the first and fourth are not sequences. In a sequence the order matters absolutely, but these do fall under the looser category of "patterns" Wikipedia entry for sequence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Guest
Fill in an answer that continues the patterns: (there may be more than one correct answer for each)
A) 0111 01101111 1110 011011011111 0011111111111100 ?
B) A L E J ?
C) C L M ?
D) AEIIEAAEI AEIA AEIEAEEI AEII AEAIA EAEIIEEAEE ?
I'll post answers in a while if no one gets them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.