Jump to content


Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.

Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.

If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.

Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

Photo
- - - - -

Sack


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
60 replies to this topic

#51 OonslaughtoO

OonslaughtoO

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 01 November 2008 - 05:27 AM

Logic does not have to be simple, only logical. Your bounds are set by the problem itself, no inference allowed. Now a few people have already posted the answer that fits without having to add information, like Nair's post about 7 comments back.

post May 12 2008, 01:57 PM
Post #44

"One can have some variation to the answer but logic is the same.
Pour lentil into buyer sack. Turn the sellers sack inside out . pour lentil back to seller's sack[]and tie up the sellers sack . Now untie the peas and pour into the buyer's sack. Only difference is buyer's sack is not turned inside out but sellers sack is."

Which happens to be quiet simple once you can visualize this answer.
  • 0

#52 logicalist

logicalist

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 18 November 2008 - 02:11 AM

I would have just cut a hole in the bottom of the sack so the peas fell into the buyers sack. Transaction complete.
  • 0

#53 Theimos

Theimos

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 26 November 2008 - 10:57 PM

you could cut the sack from the bottom, get the product and then tie the sack from the bottom
  • 0

#54 Ionno

Ionno

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 27 November 2008 - 03:27 AM

Couldn't you just hold the innkeepers bag under the farmers bag, then cut the bottom of the farmers bag ?

Then go home and ask the wife in the kitchen the stitch it back up. Or better yet put in a zipper incase this happens again !
  • 0

#55 Firmus_Piett

Firmus_Piett

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 21 December 2008 - 03:01 PM

The innkeeper doesn't want his goods to be devalued, and his goods are the peas. So why not pour the lentils out of the bag onto the floor and then just unbind the bag and pour the peas into the inkeepers bag. The loss wouldn't be too bad either if the inkeeper is rich.
  • 0

#56 Scraff

Scraff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 287 posts

Posted 21 December 2008 - 05:27 PM

The innkeeper doesn't want his goods to be devalued, and his goods are the peas. So why not pour the lentils out of the bag onto the floor and then just unbind the bag and pour the peas into the inkeepers bag.

Welcome to the Den. The goods are both the lentils and the peas. The point of the riddle is to not devalue either of them.

The loss wouldn't be too bad either if the inkeeper is rich.

But the rich are often smart with their money and don't buy what's unnecessary. The riddle specifically states "a rich innkeeper wanted to buy the peas, but he did not want the lentils". Your solution not only breaks the constraints of the riddle, it leaves the farmer with lentils that have been poured on the floor, and the farmer is poor.
  • 0

#57 Mrs. Cullen

Mrs. Cullen

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 04 January 2009 - 10:45 PM

then trade sacks


:excl: It says you can't trade sacks. :excl:
  • 0

#58 dietpepsi

dietpepsi

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 08 January 2009 - 05:32 PM

i would ve jst cut the sack under the knot which would make two sacks, and then u just give the one with the peas to the rich person buying them. i think that the "Hw would you solve this problem if you had only the sack of the innkeeper way u put" made us thikn only one bag was involved, not two.
  • 0

#59 vchopra

vchopra

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 08 January 2009 - 05:42 PM

Open the sack from the bottom and sell the peas. Now there is room in the sack and knot can be tied at this end too.
  • 0

#60 God of the Godless

God of the Godless

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 20 March 2010 - 07:02 PM

I have an issue with this. You end up putting the peas in an inside-out sack. The sack has probably been sitting in all kinds of places, and the outside is probably dirty. Isn't putting the peas in contact with the outside of the sack devaluing it?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users