## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

 Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Guest Message by DevFuse

# Partitioning a Rectangle...

3 replies to this topic

### #1 Anza Power

Anza Power

Junior Member

• Members
• 80 posts

Posted 11 June 2012 - 12:50 PM

I've been pondering this for a few months now and haven't got a clue yet what to do...

Prove that if you have a rectangle and you partition it into smaller rectangles such that every rectangle has at least 1 edge of integer length, then the large rectangle has 1 edge of integer length.

The proof is supposed to be simple by using the fact that in a graph the number of nodes with odd degrees is even, and it's generalized for Rn, but I'm still stuck even on R2...

Edited by Anza Power, 11 June 2012 - 12:51 PM.

• 0

### #2 Rox53

Rox53

Newbie

• Members
• 9 posts

Posted 11 June 2012 - 01:33 PM

If you start with a rectangle with no integer edges, then at least one of the smaller rectangles will also lack integer edges. This is heuristically true - but I can't prove it yet.
If my first statement can be proved, then it follows that the original proposition (If you have a rectangle and you partition it into smaller rectangles such that every rectangle has at least 1 edge of integer length, then the large rectangle has 1 edge of integer length) must be true.
• 0

### #3 curr3nt2

curr3nt2

Newbie

• Members
• 1 posts

Posted 12 June 2012 - 11:07 PM

Spoiler for maybe...?

• 0

### #4 witzar

witzar

• Members
• 233 posts

Posted 19 June 2012 - 07:17 PM

Look here for proofs (there are many):
http://mathdl.maa.or...agon601-617.pdf
• 0

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users