If you feel like a picture would make it easier ...

## Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum

Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |

### #1

Posted 23 February 2008 - 04:33 PM

If you feel like a picture would make it easier ...

### #2

Posted 23 February 2008 - 04:51 PM

In a molecule of CF4 (carbon tetrafluoride) you have one carbon atom and four fluoride atoms. Let's assume that all four fluoride atoms are equally attracted to the carbon, and equally repelled by each other (of course it doesn't really work like that, but just work with me). What would be the angle formed by any two fluoride atoms, with the carbon atom as the vertex?

*The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.*

- Bertrand Russell

### #3

Posted 23 February 2008 - 04:55 PM

### #4

Posted 23 February 2008 - 11:31 PM

ALPHA around 109 degrees

### #5

Posted 24 February 2008 - 02:27 AM

### #6

Posted 24 February 2008 - 03:14 AM

I'll see if I can the make the next one more challenging.

**Edited by Duh Puck, 24 February 2008 - 03:15 AM.**

### #7

Posted 24 February 2008 - 07:09 AM

Well in fairness cos[x] = -1/3 is not a solution. It's the answer. A solution shows how the answer is obtained. I didn't do that. But for the record the formula can be derived by considering the dot product of the vectors from the carbon atom to two of the Fluorine atoms. The tangent formula can be seen by putting the carbon atom at the center of a cube. The fluorine atoms then occupy four cube corners that can be connected with face diagonals. You can easily draw a solvable triangle formed by the C atom, the midpoint of a face diagonal and an F atom at one end of that diagonal. Halve the cube diagonal and you've got the tangent of half the angle in question.Good job, but that was too easy. This was a question that occurred to me back in high school chemistry, and I solved it using a ridiculously convoluted approach. Later I showed it to a friend and he pointed out a much simpler method, although even his solution wasn't as simple as Cos(x) = -1/3.

I'll see if I can the make the next one more challenging.

I imagine there is a solution based on spherical trigonometry as well. Anyone know of it?

*The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.*

- Bertrand Russell

### #8

Posted 24 February 2008 - 08:20 AM

Where did you get that?Cos(ALPHA) = 1/3

ALPHA around 109 degrees

cos

^{-1}[1/3] is 70.528779365509308630754000660038 degrees.

*The greatest challenge to any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution.*

- Bertrand Russell

### #9

Posted 24 February 2008 - 03:14 PM

Thanks! I don't feel quite as slow when you put it that way.Well in fairness cos[x] = -1/3 is not a solution. It's the answer. A solution shows how the answer is obtained. I didn't do that. But for the record the formula can be derived by considering the dot product of the vectors from the carbon atom to two of the Fluorine atoms. The tangent formula can be seen by putting the carbon atom at the center of a cube. The fluorine atoms then occupy four cube corners that can be connected with face diagonals. You can easily draw a solvable triangle formed by the C atom, the midpoint of a face diagonal and an F atom at one end of that diagonal. Halve the cube diagonal and you've got the tangent of half the angle in question.

#### 0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users