[Guest]

You are a detective. You take a lunch break at a spherical restaurant. The lights go off you here a scream. Lady at table 42 is dead on the floor. You have narrowed it down to 4 possible suspects. The vacationer, the waitress, the manager, and the chef. They all have stories, but one of them is lying. Feel free to ask questions. I will start.

I ask the vacationer: Where were you at the scene of the crime.

[Guest]

SOMETHING HAS HAPPENED!!! Otherwise SHH!!!!!!

The lights turn off, they seem like their off for good. TRUSTY CELL PHONE TO THE RESCUE! Nancy calls a technician. Technician says: I'll be their in about an hour. FYI, me and you people are the detective. We see if anything happened. We find the manager dead, seemingly strangled. We feel his pulse, none, wait! two beats per min. .............. still two. We have till 5 tonite to save him, i will inform you because of the different timezones.

How do we save him?

I'm calling an ambulance.

[Guest]

How do we save him?

I'm calling an ambulance.

: ) yeah, no kidding! Hardly like sherlock to do EVERYTHING by himself, even put the life of a suspect at risk, merely for the likes of doing it himself.

[Guest]

well how long will it take for an ambulance to get here? and what time is it now? are there bruises? GET THE SHOCK PAD THINGIES!!!!!! (idk if that would help...)

[Guest]

Chef says: I don't want you snooping around in my kitchen, nothing personal, just I am very protective about my space.

Now the Chef is probably very protective of his girl, the waitress. Maybe the girl's best friend said something bad about him and he wanted revenge. Now, perhaps the manager disapproved of their relationship so he strangled him.

Now furthermore, if most of the crime was done by gloves, who could have the gloves? The vacationer would have nowhere to store the gloves after the murder, neither will the waitress. Only the cook has a personal stash of items where he can hide the gloves.

However, on a side thought the waitress is slightly incriminated. The cook most likely filled her in and asked her to clean up the mess to help save him. Since she still loves him very much, she agreed.

[Guest]

Now the Chef is probably very protective of his girl, the waitress. Maybe the girl's best friend said something bad about him and he wanted revenge. Now, perhaps the manager disapproved of their relationship so he strangled him.

well that could be or the manager could have caught a glimpse of the murderer or something suspicious. the said person could have then also seen the manager looking at him/her and gone after the manager. i doubt it was Nancy because she doesn't seem strong enough (i mean emotionally) to go after her dad.

[Guest]

well that could be or the manager could have caught a glimpse of the murderer or something suspicious. the said person could have then also seen the manager looking at him/her and gone after the manager. i doubt it was Nancy because she doesn't seem strong enough (i mean emotionally) to go after her dad.

And yes I agree that Nancy would not kill her father... which leaves only the vacationer and the cook.

Inspect the vacationer's bags to check for gloves or other killing tools.

Then inspect the cook's kitchen regardless of whether he likes it or not. I am confident that we can find gloves in there.

Edited May 1, 2009 by James T

[Guest]

And yes I agree that Nancy would not kill her father... which leaves only the vacationer and the cook.

Inspect the vacationer's bags to check for gloves or other killing tools.

Then inspect the cook's kitchen regardless of whether he likes it or not. I am confident that we can find gloves in there.

Yes, the cook doesn't really have a say whether we go through his stuff or not. I'm leaning towards the chef as the suspect for a few reasons. It almost seems like there's a HUGE love war going on.

Could TWO murders possibly have been committed merely for the "love" of nancy? I say chef killed anyone who might get in the way of him and nancy, and that would be the friend and the father.

Although, it could be, we have two murderers here, and the traveller killed the first victim (taylor?), and the chef killed the father. No, the other way around. Gee, I'm not sure now. It seems like the maker of this crime is holding back and not sure how the thing's going to play out herself, in order to keep things going, I'd personally like to get to a possible conclusion, here.

[Guest]

hahaha! TO THE KITCHEN!!!!!!!!

[Guest]

Like someone said, i dont feel like going to find their post, but you would have to press very hard in the skin. And if you were to kill someone, the blood would splatter.

to you: Did anyone have any blood splattered on any clothes they were wearing.

Question of Clarification:So..there is a murder. Lunch time, no lights. Lights turn off, someone dies. Obviously 4 suspects. We know that the Vacationer has already caught himself lying and has tried to cover it up. First being to get away from kids, then its "Business Trip" then he has to say that the kids think its a "Business Trip"..He said that the criminal would lie every time or try to make himself not a suspect.

to vacationer: How many kids? Is there any stress related problems going on between you, your wife, and your kids? Did you get fired recently?

[Guest]

Yes, the cook doesn't really have a say whether we go through his stuff or not. I'm leaning towards the chef as the suspect for a few reasons. It almost seems like there's a HUGE love war going on.

Could TWO murders possibly have been committed merely for the "love" of nancy? I say chef killed anyone who might get in the way of him and nancy, and that would be the friend and the father.

Although, it could be, we have two murderers here, and the traveller killed the first victim (taylor?), and the chef killed the father. No, the other way around. Gee, I'm not sure now. It seems like the maker of this crime is holding back and not sure how the thing's going to play out herself, in order to keep things going, I'd personally like to get to a possible conclusion, here.

I agree with the 2nd paragraph thing. Yes, the love Nancy would definately be needed. I think to add on to yours: That he killed her best friend and was hoping for Nancy to come crying to him, asking him for help. Well, she probably didn't and went to the manager. NOW he gets jealous. He kills the manager, hoping that Nancy would still come to him crying...This is all falling into place

I'd say chef

[Guest]

I agree with the 2nd paragraph thing. Yes, the love Nancy would definately be needed. I think to add on to yours: That he killed her best friend and was hoping for Nancy to come crying to him, asking him for help. Well, she probably didn't and went to the manager. NOW he gets jealous. He kills the manager, hoping that Nancy would still come to him crying...This is all falling into place

I'd say chef

Oooh, the chef is sadistic!!! I love this reckless morbid love affair. I love your thinking.

chef

[Guest]

How do we save him?

I'm calling an ambulance.

Wanna make this game fun, or not?

Edited May 1, 2009 by Kittykat101

[Guest]

well how long will it take for an ambulance to get here? and what time is it now? are there bruises? GET THE SHOCK PAD THINGIES!!!!!! (idk if that would help...)

No ambulance, it is 7:43, their are no bruises, we use SPT and he wakes up, stutters, and passes out. His pulse is 16 per min, his usual, is 84.

[Guest]

Now the Chef is probably very protective of his girl, the waitress. Maybe the girl's best friend said something bad about him and he wanted revenge. Now, perhaps the manager disapproved of their relationship so he strangled him.

Now furthermore, if most of the crime was done by gloves, who could have the gloves? The vacationer would have nowhere to store the gloves after the murder, neither will the waitress. Only the cook has a personal stash of items where he can hide the gloves.

However, on a side thought the waitress is slightly incriminated. The cook most likely filled her in and asked her to clean up the mess to help save him. Since she still loves him very much, she agreed.

Well, the vacationer has a briefcase, and the waitress has pockets, or she could of snuck around and hid them. Otherwise, you are really close.

[Guest]

And yes I agree that Nancy would not kill her father... which leaves only the vacationer and the cook.

Inspect the vacationer's bags to check for gloves or other killing tools.

Then inspect the cook's kitchen regardless of whether he likes it or not. I am confident that we can find gloves in there.

1. He's not dead, he may be in a coma, or just unconscious.

2. Vacationer says: YOU CAN'T DO THIS! IT'S WRONG ITS.... JUST MEAN! I HAVE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY! We open his briefcase, it's filled with pornography.

3. We search the whole, kitchen, only dirty dishes. But then he kicks us. Wow, these men have some privacy issues...

[Guest]

Yes, the cook doesn't really have a say whether we go through his stuff or not. I'm leaning towards the chef as the suspect for a few reasons. It almost seems like there's a HUGE love war going on.

Could TWO murders possibly have been committed merely for the "love" of nancy? I say chef killed anyone who might get in the way of him and nancy, and that would be the friend and the father. Uh... Close, also you have to explain your theories.

Although, it could be, we have two murderers here, and the traveller killed the first victim (taylor?), and the chef killed the father. No, the other way around. Gee, I'm not sure now. It seems like the maker of this crime is holding back and not sure how the thing's going to play out herself, in order to keep things going, I'd personally like to get to a possible conclusion, here.

[Guest]

Like someone said, i dont feel like going to find their post, but you would have to press very hard in the skin. And if you were to kill someone, the blood would splatter.

to you: Did anyone have any blood splattered on any clothes they were wearing. GLOVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Question of Clarification:So..there is a murder. Lunch time, no lights. Lights turn off, someone dies. Obviously 4 suspects. We know that the Vacationer has already caught himself lying and has tried to cover it up. First being to get away from kids, then its "Business Trip" then he has to say that the kids think its a "Business Trip"..He said that the criminal would lie every time or try to make himself not a suspect. No, how do you know the vacationer lied?

to vacationer: How many kids? Is there any stress related problems going on between you, your wife, and your kids? Did you get fired recently? 3, kids. My family is really annoying, i like to get as far away from them as possible... I've been working at the pillow factory for 20 years, and i haven't gotten fired once.

[Guest]

2. Vacationer says: YOU CAN'T DO THIS! IT'S WRONG ITS.... JUST MEAN! I HAVE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY! We open his briefcase, it's filled with pornography.

3. We search the whole, kitchen, only dirty dishes. But then he kicks us. Wow, these men have some privacy issues...

2. Hmm... so he took a vacation away from his wife and kids to look at some porn by himself...

3. Check the trashcans and dumpster outside. The gloves were probably thrown in there.

[Guest]

Hey everyone, i just want to tell you, that i have no idea what this story is leading to and i'm making it up along the way, but, I do know who the murderer is and why they did it. ANYWAY, I'll tell you, one or 2 people are behind this, not 3 not 4 not none.

[Guest]

2. Hmm... so he took a vacation away from his wife and kids to look at some porn by himself...

3. Check the trashcans and dumpster outside. The gloves were probably thrown in there.

We check the dumpster+ the trash can, nada, zip, nothin, except hmmm..... GARBAGE!

[Guest]

I think it was the chef because he would seem the least suspicious with the weapons. Is there blood on the computer?

[Guest]

Maybe the guys case was filled with porn because he works in that industry. Also the women murdered was in the industry then left. Also she was the best he had so he killed her for walking out on him on a film or something. (Sorry don't know the names)

[Guest]

Hey everyone, i just want to tell you, that i have no idea what this story is leading to and i'm making it up along the way, but, I do know who the murderer is and why they did it. ANYWAY, I'll tell you, one or 2 people are behind this, not 3 not 4 not none.

I'm definitely thinking that it is the cook and his girlfriend. They would have plenty of time alone and in secret to plan it out.

[Guest]

I think it was the chef because he would seem the least suspicious with the weapons. Is there blood on the computer?

No, it's clean.

[Guest]

I'm definitely thinking that it is the cook and his girlfriend. They would have plenty of time alone and in secret to plan it out.

Why would nancy kill her dad and her best friend?