Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum
|Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account.
As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends.
Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games.
If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top.
If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen.
Thanks and enjoy the Den :-)
Honestants and Swindlecants VI.
Posted 07 March 2008 - 03:09 AM
Let's say the bartender told the patron that the cost of the drink was $100:
a) If he is honest, that would actually be the cost, AND he would have replied "Yes" when asked if he told the truth.
b) If he is dishonest, the drink would have cost $x (x≠$100), AND he would have replied "Yes" when asked if he told the truth.
So, everyone has concluded that the bartender's response was always "Yes"...BUT, what if
c) He is dishonest, and the drink cost $x (x≠$100), AND he responded to the truth inquiry with a "Maybe" (after all, the patron didn't hear him). That is still dishonest (he knows the price of the drink) and still answers the inquiry.
So, if "c)" holds true, both the bartender and the man are dishonest.
Now, the man:
1) If he is honest, the bartender said "Yes", AND is a big liar.
2) If he is dishonest, the bartender could have said "Yes" but is not a big liar (see "a)")
3) If he is dishonest, the bartender could have also said "Maybe" AND is a big liar. (one lie, one truth)
So, I'm left with:
A) Man = dishonest, Bartender = dishonest (option "3c")
B) Man = honest, Bartender = dishonest (option "1b")
C) Man = dishonest, Bartender = honest (option "2a")
I hope I'm just confused, because I really don't want to have spent this much time thinking about this if there really is no answer to deduce. I do know that it isn't possible that they're both telling the truth, though.
Posted 05 November 2008 - 01:58 PM
I have one important question? If the gringo knows the nature of Honestants and Swindlecants, what the heck is he doing drinking on this island?? If he's silly enough compromise his faculties in an obviously logic intensive society, then he deserves to pay whatever the bartender chooses to charge him.
Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:58 AM
I have do disagree that these two parts are connected. In an if-then statement, the sentence parts in logical form are connected, the same with an either or statement. However, "and" and "but" statements are not connected, at least not in this format, as they can be separated into two separate sentences, so your logical path here is false, not the statement.
Honestants and Swindlecants VI. - Back to the Logic Problems
When the gringo wanted to pay and leave the pub, the bartender told him how much his drink costed. It was quite expensive, so he asked the bartender if he spoke the truth. But the gringo did not hear the whispered answer so he asked a man sitting next to him about it. And the man said: "The bartender said yes, but he is a big liar." Who are they?Spoiler for Solution
Since you can separate "he said yes" from "he is a big liar" in sentence structure, gramatically, and change it to "He said yes. He is a big liar." It must be two separate statements combined by "but," meaning that for him to state one of them as truth and one as a lie would be impossible under these predefined conditions (honestant and swindlecant).
Look at it like this:
With an if/then situation or an either/or situation, you cannot separate the situation into two whole sentences, and still retain the whole content in truth.
However, with an "and" or "but" statement, you CAN, meaning that if you CAN separate them into complete sentences simply by taking out "and" or "but," and adding a period in place of the comma, they are two separate statements combined by a conjunction, and as such, in these conditions, they would both have to be false, or both be true.
In this case, as one part of the statement was proven true (by the fact that a liar could not call himself a liar and be lying) and the man who was asked claimed the truth in that part, and the second part "he is a big liar" is a separate clause, and thus a separate statement, devoid of the effect from the first statement, and only affected by whether or not the character is an honestant, it is proven that they are an honestant, as they have already spoken one complete truth.
Posted 01 May 2011 - 10:28 AM
he must say "yes".
if bartender was a honest person , then when asked about price he would have told the correct price and when asked "is it truth??" he will say yes.
so what ever it is bartender always says "yes"
so the man sitting beside is the honest one as he said "bartender said yes, but is a big liar".
and according to his statement bartender is a liar.
Posted 05 May 2011 - 10:59 AM
The gringo asked the bartender "Are you an honestant?" The deaf bartender who could read lips but who had just turned away from the patron, returned to faced the gringo and whispered, "Repeat your question, I am a bit deaf." The gringo, himself having not heard, turned to the patron sitting next to him and asked the patron, "Is the bartender an honestant?" The patron replied, "The bartender said yes, but he is a big liar".
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users