[Nikyma]

A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

[Guest]

they were driving cars like the ones used while playing golf on a golf course?

[Nikyma]

they were driving cars like the ones used while playing golf on a golf course?

Sorry, not the ticket.

[Guest]

the other car was a chicken truck! The passenger that lost his legs was a chicken.

[Guest]

A careless driver caused an accident.

Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed.

However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result.

When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine.

Why was the judge so lenient?

Legs where prosthesis'

Can you answer true or false ???

[Nikyma]

the other car was a chicken truck! The passenger that lost his legs was a chicken.

No, the passenger was a human.

[Nikyma]

Can you answer true or false ???

Legs where prosthesis'

False

[akaslickster]

negligent drivers passenger was hurt they need to settle in another court.

[Nikyma]

negligent drivers passenger was hurt they need to settle in another court.

sorry, no

[Guest]

because the guy who got mangled went to hospital for shock but was confused with a patient with a similar name who was due to have his legs gut off for a gang green infection

the legs were cut of but the driver was only fined for reckless driving

the hospital however were sued 20 million dollars

can you say true or false

[Nikyma]

can you say true or false

because the guy who got mangled went to hospital for shock but was confused with a patient with a similar name who was due to have his legs gut off for a gang green infection

the legs were cut of but the driver was only fined for reckless driving

the hospital however were sued 20 million dollars

false

[Guest]

A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

the careless driver was in one car and the other driver and the passenger were in other car. the other driver lost his control on the car and there was an accident. so the other driver had to pay a heavy fine while the careless one had to pay a small fine?

[Nikyma]

the careless driver was in one car and the other driver and the passenger were in other car. the other driver lost his control on the car and there was an accident. so the other driver had to pay a heavy fine while the careless one had to pay a small fine?

Sorry, no.

[Guest]

The car was a hearse and the passenger was already dead.

[Brandonb]

A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

The other driver was shipping manikins or dolls of some sort.

[Nikyma]

The car was a hearse and the passenger was already dead.

Yes, you've got it.