Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

Question

A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
A careless driver caused an accident.

Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed.

However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result.

When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine.

Why was the judge so lenient?

Legs where prosthesis'

Can you answer true or false ???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

because the guy who got mangled went to hospital for shock but was confused with a patient with a similar name who was due to have his legs gut off for a gang green infection

the legs were cut of but the driver was only fined for reckless driving

the hospital however were sued 20 million dollars

can you say true or false

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

can you say true or false

because the guy who got mangled went to hospital for shock but was confused with a patient with a similar name who was due to have his legs gut off for a gang green infection

the legs were cut of but the driver was only fined for reckless driving

the hospital however were sued 20 million dollars

false

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

the careless driver was in one car and the other driver and the passenger were in other car. the other driver lost his control on the car and there was an accident. so the other driver had to pay a heavy fine while the careless one had to pay a small fine?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
the careless driver was in one car and the other driver and the passenger were in other car. the other driver lost his control on the car and there was an accident. so the other driver had to pay a heavy fine while the careless one had to pay a small fine?

Sorry, no.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
A careless driver caused an accident. Fortunately, both he and the other driver were wearing seatbelts and were unharmed. However, a passenger in the other care (who was not wearing a seatbelt) was very badly mangled and lost both his legs as a result. When the case came to court, the careless driver received only a small fine. Why was the judge so lenient?

The other driver was shipping manikins or dolls of some sort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...