Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers
  • 0

Magic hexagon


bonanova
 Share

Question

The figure shows nineteen circles arranged hexagonally in fifteen rows of length 3, 4 or 5.

Place consecutive numbers in the circles so that .

  1. At least one row in each of the three directions contains exactly one pair of numbers
    (e.g. 17 and 34) that differ by a factor of 2.
  2. Exactly one of the six outer vertices contains a prime. (1 is not prime.)
  3. Exactly one two of the six inner vertices (connected to the center) contains a prime.
  4. The fifteen row sums are identical.

        post-1048-0-55990000-1416467248_thumb.gi

Edited by bonanova
Correcting Clue 3.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0


 

There is a published paper that demonstrates that there is a unique solution to the order-3 magic hexagon.


http://www.yau-awards.org/English/N/N92-Research%20into%20the%20Order%203%20Magic%20Hexagon.pdf

------ 3--17--18------ Condition 1 is satisfied with (4,8) in the fourth horizontal row,
----19-- 7-- 1--11---- and (2,4) in the second L-to-R-diagonal row.
--16-- 2-- 5-- 6-- 9-- Condition 2 is sastisfied {3,9,10,15,16,18} only 3 is prime.
----12-- 4-- 8--14---- Condition 3 fails {1,2,4,6,7,8} both 2 and 7 are prime.
------10--13--15------Condition 4 is satisfied - all fifteen rows sum to 38.
Edited by DejMar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can you clarify "consecutive numbers"? Does the puzzle require that all neighboring circles of a given circle had a number either 1 smaller or 1 greater than the number in the given circle? Or does it simply mean that the entire set of numbers used to fill in the puzzle must be a consecutive set?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There is a published paper that demonstrates that there is a unique solution to the order-3 magic hexagon.

http://www.yau-awards.org/English/N/N92-Research%20into%20the%20Order%203%20Magic%20Hexagon.pdf

------ 3--17--18------ Condition 1 is satisfied with (4,8) in the fourth horizontal row,

----19-- 7-- 1--11---- and (2,4) in the second L-to-R-diagonal row.

--16-- 2-- 5-- 6-- 9-- Condition 2 is sastisfied {3,9,10,15,16,18} only 3 is prime.

----12-- 4-- 8--14---- Condition 3 fails {1,2,4,6,7,8} both 2 and 7 are prime.

------10--13--15------Condition 4 is satisfied - all fifteen rows sum to 38.

Edit: I'm dumb. Edited by gavinksong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Are we allowed to use negative numbers? And if we are, how does primality work?

Primality only applies to positive integers (i.e., natural numbers) by definition. Yet, in a non-formal definition of a prime number, the negative of a positive prime number can be associated as being the same prime number. Thus, with the second definition permitting negative values, 2 and -2, for example, are the same prime, while by the first definition negative numbers are not prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...