if at first you don't succeed, parachuting may not be for you.
i don't want to be quoted, and don't quote that i don't want to be quoted!
eat right, exercise often, die anyway.
there are no stupid questions, but there are alot of inqusitive idiots.
computer programming is the race between software developers creating more fool-proof systems, and the universe creating better fools. so far, the universe is winning.
capitalism is based on the idea that you can win. fascism is based on the idea that you can break even. communism is based on the idea that you can quit the game. what have we learned? you can't win, you can't break even, you can't quit the game.
when disaster strikes, a good manager always has a scape goat.
if you make your self irreplacable, you can't be promoted. if you don't, you can be fired.
the squeaky wheel gets replaced.
there are two methods to arguing with women. the first is to use your point like a blunt instrument, hammering it over and over agian until she gives in. the second is to patiently, lovingly, lay out your point, being respectful of her ideas. neither method works.
you can fool some people all the time, you can fool all people some of the time, but you can't fool all people all the time.
Question
Guest
if at first you don't succeed, parachuting may not be for you.
eat right, exercise often, die anyway.
there are no stupid questions, but there are alot of inqusitive idiots.
computer programming is the race between software developers creating more fool-proof systems, and the universe creating better fools. so far, the universe is winning.
capitalism is based on the idea that you can win. fascism is based on the idea that you can break even. communism is based on the idea that you can quit the game. what have we learned? you can't win, you can't break even, you can't quit the game.
when disaster strikes, a good manager always has a scape goat.
if you make your self irreplacable, you can't be promoted. if you don't, you can be fired.
the squeaky wheel gets replaced.
there are two methods to arguing with women. the first is to use your point like a blunt instrument, hammering it over and over agian until she gives in. the second is to patiently, lovingly, lay out your point, being respectful of her ideas. neither method works.
you can fool some people all the time, you can fool all people some of the time, but you can't fool all people all the time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.