• 0
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Question

Posted · Report post

If an event T is a tautology, then P[T] = 1 (e.g. T = I am myself)

If an event C is a contradiction, then P[C] = 0 (e.g. C = an empty cup is full)

What is the probability of a tautology given a contradiction? i.e. What is P[T|C]?

So.....

What is the probability that I am myself given that an empty cup is full?

What would Bayes say?

What is the probability that the universe exists given that the statement "this statement is false" is true?

If the event p is a paradox, then what are:

P[T|p] ?

P[C|p] ?

P[p|T] ?

P[p|C] ?

P[p|p] ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

  • 0

Posted · Report post

as logic shows 'a contradiction implies everything'..So, to say

(a&-A) --> (b v-b)

is a tautology in itself. But so is the entailment

(a&-a) --> (b&-b)

The probability of a tautology given a contradiction is whatever, so there ios no contradiction to say that

the probability of a tautology given a contradiction is 1

The same, though, holds true for the expression

the probability of a tautolgy given a contradiction is 0 or 0,1.....0,2.....0.3 ....etc.

ad infinitum

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted · Report post

as logic shows 'a contradiction implies everything'..So, to say

(a&-A) --> (b v-b)

is a tautology in itself. But so is the entailment

(a&-a) --> (b&-b)

The probability of a tautology given a contradiction is whatever, so there ios no contradiction to say that

the probability of a tautology given a contradiction is 1

The same, though, holds true for the expression

the probability of a tautolgy given a contradiction is 0 or 0,1.....0,2.....0.3 ....etc.

ad infinitum

So are you saying that the probability of anything given a contradiction is undefined?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Posted · Report post

So are you saying that the probability of anything given a contradiction is undefined?

it is undefined...

So logic dictates. Your question raises automatically what in logic is called 'the paradox of material implication', i.e. that from a contradiction everything can happen

But because in fact no contradiction can hold, the theoretical paradox is cancelled

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.