-
Posts
204 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by jasen
-
-
I can prove this hipothesis is wrong !
let say the tipewritter only have 5 hammers and it was set like this :
letter 2 placed at hammer 1
letter 3 placed at hammer 2
letter 5 placed at hammer 3
letter 1 placed at hammer 4
letter 4 placed at hammer 5our expected word is "12345"
1st iteration 2 3 5 1 4
2nd iteration 3 5 4 2 1
3rd iteration 4 1 2 5 3
4th iteration 5 4 1 3 2
5th iteration 2 3 5 1 4 (it is back to 1st iteration)so it will never reveal the the expected word.
-
bonanova, this your puzzle drives me mad
Only communication can make them survive !
So I think they must create unseen communication between them,
I've find a trick for them to communicate.
They must communicate with time !!let say a,b,c,d ..... are the prisoners names in sequence, no need to sort.
every prisoner must know who will enter the room after him,
so 'a' know 'b' will enter the room after 'a'.
'a' open 50 first boxes (1 to 50), if he find 'b' name there, so he must leave the room before 10 minutes.
'b' notice that 'a' leave the room before 10 minutes, so he know that his name is at 50 first boxes (1 to 50).
but if 'a', leave the room after 10 minutes, means that his name is not there so he must open boxes 51 to 100.with same way, 'b' give information to 'c'.
and the probability they all save are 50% !!
-
How about this :
everybody have to memorize each person position
n = one's position in the sorted names.
x = friend's position in the sorted names.
Open the n-th box,
if he find his friend name, open the x-th box. repeat this for the next 48 box. -
Hidden Content
Someone still can argue that your reasoning is not a prove.
-
I think this strategy is better
everybody have to memorize each person position
say :
n = his position
x = (name in the opened box) positionevery person open n-th box
then exchange the box (with the x-th box)
repeat this to the next box 50 times, but he have to skip the box if it have been exchanged.
if it reach the last box, go to first box -
I think I can write every rational number in repeating decimals
1 = 0.99999999........
4 = 3.99999999.......
17.5 = 17.4999999....and so on.
wheather my statement is right or wrong,
prove your agreement or objection. -
can they sort the boxes (by names) they open ?
if they can :
first person open 1st box then exchange the box (the 1st box with the n-th name position of the box)
repeat this to the next box 50 times, but he have to skip the box if it have been exchanged2nd person open 2nd box then exchange the box (the 1st box with the n-th name position of the box)
repeat this to the next box 50 times, but he have to skip the box if it have been exchangedall prisoner do the same
-
what you mean "they can open at most 50 boxes" ?
total boxes they can open or each prisoner can open 50 boxesIf each prisoner can open 50 boxes, I think, surviving probability is more than 50%
-
I have create a program to count braces from 1 to 5000
1. I don't know what you mean "recursive numbers".
2. I found hypothesis 2 is wrong
4999 = <<<>><<><><><><<>>>> = 10 brackets
5000 = <><><><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>> = 15 brackets -
Miss Scarlet, wrench, kitchen
Col. Mustard, lead pipe, library
Mrs. White, gun, conservatory
Prof. Plum, rope, study -
put 1 dice at the right side and 1 dice at the left of a ballance scale.
after several times changing different side of the dices,
we can find the normal weight.then let the left dice as standard.
then weight other three dices, each side once.
if a dice show anomally (get heavier/lighter) when the side changed,it must be cheat dice.
if we find 1 dice without anomally then it is the true dice.if all 3 dices is not true dice, so the left dice which we use as standard is the true dice.
-
Now I am confused.
I think I followed the strategy you described yesterday, when you postulated that it would deliver 100% chance of winning.
But, now your simulation it gives you a 50% chance of winning.
Did I miss something??
I was quoting bonanova solution/answer, not my proposed strategy.
I was working on the strategy that you describe:
- Bet half my money [rounded to an integer]; or
- bet the "ceiling" [twice my original money - Current money].
Testing this in a spread sheet [with only about 100 trials] I am winning about 62% of the time.
Your strategy is not applicable, you can't bet more money than you have, if your current money is 50$, your original money is 100$, so 2*100-50 = 150$, which you don't have.
Now I explain, my proposed strategy.
If I have 100$, then I bet 50$, if I lose, my money remains 50$
Now I have 50$, then I bet 25$, if I lose, my money remains 25$
Now I have 25$, then I bet 12.5$, if I lose, my money remains 12.5$this keep happens, the game will never over, to infinitely small amount of money.
but :
if I have 100$, then I bet 50$, if I win, my money is 150$
Now I have 150$, then I bet 50$, if I win, my money is 200$game over, and I win.
so. it seem that I will win 100%.
But, My proposed strategy although theoretically true, it is not applicable.
If I'm lucky I will win in a few step, but if not, it will take an infinite time to win.
then I will give up, an bet rest of my money.so I conclude, there is no strategy to win, we only have 50% chance to win.
-
I don't know of a strategy to win coin tosses. I would expect to go broke or double my money with equal likelihood. Even so, here's what I would probably do:
Hidden Content
I have run computer simulation with your strategy, and your chance to win is 50%
-
Consider this : Keep bet half of your money, and your probability to win is 100%
theoritically this is true.do you agree this strategy ?
-
Adding on to Rob_G
Hidden Content
very close! just wrong 1 digit.
the question is asking for sum bellow 1000.
-
So...
Hidden Content
good start but wrong, your way to find out sum of multiple 3 and 5 are still wrong.
-
If we list all the natural numbers below 10 that are multiples of 3 or 5, we get 3, 5, 6 and 9. The sum of these multiples is 23.
Find the sum of all the multiples of 3 or 5 below 1000.
It is easy to find the answer using computer, but it's more interesting if we can solve it without coding.
-
The game is guessing head or tail of a coin toss, so the probability to win is 50%
-
In a gambling game, the rules are :
you bring an amount of money,
you can bet any amount of money you like,the game stop if :
1. your money have doubled (exactly 2x your first amount of money)
2. or you lose all of your money.you can't stop in the middle of the game.
example : if you bring 10 dollars:
1. If you bet all your money in the first bet, so if you win you get 20 dollars and game over, or if you lose, you lose all your money and game over.
2 If you have already win 19 dollars, so in the next game you maximum bet is only 1 dollar.what is your strategy to win the game ?
-
Hidden Content
Right !
This case is one of the famous misleading sequence
For n=1, you get 1 region.
For n=2, you get 2 regions.
For n=3, you get 4 regions.
For n=4, you get 8 regions.
For n=5, you get 16 regions.See a pattern?
Yes, but if you conjecture that n points produces 2n-1 regions, you would be wrong!
The correct answer is a little more subtle:
it is the sum of the first 5 binomial coefficients for power (n-1):1 = 1
1 1 = 2
1 2 1 = 4
1 3 3 1 = 8
1 4 6 4 1 = 16
1 5 10 10 51= 31
1 6 15 20 156 1= 57
1 7 21 35 3521 7 1= 99 -
Hidden Content
wrong! You are trapped. Check again.
-
-
hint
Hidden Content
modified Stern-Brocot Tree to third sequence.
3rd sequence 34/55 157/254 123/199 212/343 89/144 233/377 144/233 199/322 55/89since it use fibbonaci number, which is relatively prime, so the fraction is already in simple form.
so there is no fraction with 55<b<89
-
An observation without an explanation
Hidden Content
maybe this have something to do with math golden ratio,
which it close to 1.6180339887...2/3 = 1.5
3/5 = 1.6666....
5/8 = 1,6
8/13 = 1.623
.....
144/233 = 1.618055556....
233/377 = 1.618025751....
April Fool's Day and the typewriter
in New Logic/Math Puzzles
Posted
@bonanova, thanks for correcting me.