-
Posts
79 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by Anza Power
-
-
I saw this riddle before, and I implemented an HTML version of it:
http://anzapower.webs.com/riddles/amoeba/game.html
And actually it has already been posted:
-
52 Weeks in a Year.
64 Squares on a Chess Board.
12 Months in a Year.
60 Seconds in a Minute
-
Question, can the digits repeat inside an L-shaped area?
For example the 14+ be:
2 6
6
??
-
Or dump everything and have 0 in all of them
- 1
-
It seems that this puzzle is NP-hard and not NP-complete (if I understand this correctly), as there is not an efficient way to prove that the solution is minimal, without an exhaustive search for a better one. (Though a solution can be proved to be valid easily enough, just not minimal.)
Actually it's O(1).
Your comment got me thinking, I couldn't say that it's in NP because there is no n in the problem, We have 130 as a starting point and we want to see if any of the binome(129,8) dice combinations have 120 different sum...
Unless you are referring to the problem with "N-sided Dice", then yeah that's crazy exponential...
-
Is the arrival time continuous or discrete (whole minutes)?
Can we assume the distribution is uniform?
Continuous time is the interesting case so let's look at that with uniform distribution:
Let t=0 be 7:58, so the bus arrives anywhere in time [0,4], the kid arrives anywhere in [-3,3].
50% chance the kid arrives in segment [-3,0] and in this case his chance of catching the bus is 1.
50% chance the kid arrives in segment [0,+3] at time t1, then he would catch the bus iff it arrives in the interval [t1,4], so his chance is (4-t1)/4 = 1-t1/4, so on average that's the integral from 0 to 3 of 1-x/4 divided by 3 for normalization, which is (3-9/8)/3 = 1-3/8 = 5/8
So the final probability is (1+5/8)/2 = 13/16
-
Are there conditions other than being one-to-one and onto?
No other conditions, although if you want something really interesting try having a continuous function...
continuous image of compact space has to be compact.Oh, that's even simpler than what I had in mind:
Since the function is continuous and reversible, it has to be monotonic, assume it's monotonically rising, by definition of "continuous" lim
x->1f(x) = f(1), but f(1) is somewhere in the open segment (0,1), so let's say f(1)=1-epsilon, but since f is monotonically rising that means there is nothing mapped to the segment (1-epsilon,1) -
Golden ratio satisfies
g=1/(g-1)Assume that it is rational, then we can write g=p/q where gcd(p,q)=1
Now we have p/q=1/(p/q-1), after moving some stuff around you end up with p2-pq=q2 -> p2-q2=pq -> (p+q)(p-q)=pq.
p and q are natural numbers, easy to see that p is not 1, let m be some prime divisor of p, since gcd(p,q)=1 then a does not divide q, on the RHS of the equation we have a but on the LHS we have multiplication of two things that do not divide a so LHS cannot divide a
-
Question is why would I go around pushing cubes in holes that are in other cubes?
-
Imagine that the river is on the x axis and A and B are some dots below and above it, since the river width is consistent you can assume we already paid for the bridge and eliminate the river, as in make it's width 0, and now the shortest distance is a straight line
Well, except that we are given the river as is, with a fixed width and a bridge perpendicular to its flow.
We do not know whether the line joining the cities lines up with the bridge - a very special case with a trivial solution.
We also do not know that the cities are equidistant from the river - a fact that bears on bridge placement if is not parallel to the joining line.
I'm curious to know the two different ways BMAD has to optimize the bridge placement.
You might've misunderstood me a little bit, I should have detailed a bit more, let the river be of width 1 unit, align the axis such that the x axis is parallel with and centered the river, in other words the river would be the area -0.5<y<0.5, now "removing" the river means collapsing it and so every point that was below it now goes up by 0.5 units and every point above it goes doen 0.5 units...
-
Are there conditions other than being one-to-one and onto?
No other conditions, although if you want something really interesting try having a continuous function...
-
Imagine that the river is on the x axis and A and B are some dots below and above it, since the river width is consistent you can assume we already paid for the bridge and eliminate the river, as in make it's width 0, and now the shortest distance is a straight line
-
You mean show that for any shape there exists a direction such that if you slice through it you get two equal halves?
Well then just put the shape at point (0,0,0) and imagine slicing it parallel to the yz axis at point x, let v1(x) be the volume of the first half and v2(x) the volume of the second, if x is at the far left then v1(x)=0 and v2(x)=1, if x is at the far right then v1(x)=1 and v2(x)=0, all that's left to show is that v2 and v2 are continous and then simply apply the mean value theorem and you know there exists some x where v1(x)=v2(x)=0.6
-
Find a one-to-one and on mapping from the closed segment [0,1] to the open segment (0,1).
-
There is lots of these and others on http://www.conceptispuzzles.com/ (Ken Ken is called CalcuDoku there)
-
Multiply the numbers in the left and right circles then reverse the digits.
Replace the shapes with numbers, then write the numbers in English: six, three, five, four, four.
The next number is the number of letters in the previous number
Each circle is the XOR of the two circles below it.
-
So many, don't have the energy to go through them all...
The "find the missing number" type of questions don't usually have a strategy, you just stare at them and try to draw connections, look for patterns like for example are the numbers rising or falling, usually the answer should be very simple like taking a number and summing it's two digits and stuff like that.
The sum of every 4 circles in a line is 21
Take the numbers in the left and right squares and reverse them then sum them, so for first row 31+12 becomes 14+21 which is 35
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_coefficient
Also the chosen answer is wrong, it should be 120
We simply skip prime numbers.
-
If we multiply all 6 pairs we will get (a*b*c*d)^3.
Assume that the missing product was a*b, then among the 5 given products we see (a*c)*(b*d)=(a*d)*(b*c), if we look at the numbers obviously 5 is out of the equation because there is nothing to balance it so the only remaining match is 2*6=3*4, so a*b*c*d=2*6=12.
So the product of all 6 pairs should be 12^3, the product of the given 5 is 720, so the missing one is 12/5=2.4
-
There is no mistake, 84 is the maximum for 7 sides, 120 is the maximum for 8 sides...
In general, (n)*(n+1)*(n+2)/6 is the maximum for n sides.
-
1, 3, 6, 35, 75, 108, 121, 130
-
The pages are in the range 291-322
-
Aha, ok then here's another idea:
First everyone sends everyone their preference, and they all email each other to make sure they have the same information.
Now each one of the three generates a random 1024 bit number, call it x1 x2 x3, but first before revealing those numbers they share a cryprographically secure hash of these numbers (say SHA-512), and then after they make sure everyone know all 3 hashes they share the actual x1 x2 x3, they calculate x1+x2+x3 (mod 2^1024) and treat that as a uniform sampled random number, you can then use it to pick a restaurant
-
There are many ways, not sure which one you are looking for.
Let the preference of the friends count as "votes" towards the different restaurants, you pick a restaurant by random where the probabilities are proportional to the number of votes
-
^ the third row of the top square (the one with 9 7 6 6) is that intentional?
Mailing incongruent cubes to a friend
in New Logic/Math Puzzles
Posted · Edited by Anza Power