Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

phil1882

Members
  • Posts

    602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by phil1882

  1. edit:

    so my dad was playing with three other people in golf for 9 holes.
    The bet is each player puts in $5 dollars. There are 2 games being played. $3 dollars of the $5 goes to who has the most points and $2 of the $5 goes to the trash pot.

    At he conclusion of the 9 holes my dad was the only winner of the points pot and Larry was the only winner of the trash pot. The points pot should have $12 dollars and the trash pot should have $8.

    However my dad didn't have correct change nor did Larry so the pot was left with $10 dollars. Dad took $6 of the $10 and Larry took $4.  The next time they played Larry said we did not distribute the money correctly. Larry said Dad should have gotten $7 and Larry $3. Larry's logic is if everyone contributed to the pot, the trash pot should have $8 dollars in it. After subtracting out his contribution of $5, he should have a net winnings of $3 dollars not $4 dollars, and dad $7 dollars instead of 6.

    So which way is right???

  2. so my dad was playing with three other people in golf.

    you get 3 dollars for every hole you win, and 2 dollars for odd or unusual shots

    each player put in 5 dollars, but my dad didn't have the money nor did one of his fellow golfers.

    my dad won all the holes for 12 dollars all together, and the buddy that couldn't pay won all the money from the odd shots.

    so because neither he nor his partner contributed to the hole pot, my dad gets 6 dollars from the remaining two players, and his buddy gets 4 dollars for his.

    however, anther way to look at is, my dad won 12-5 = 7, and the buddy won 8-5 = 3 for his.

    what do you think?

     

  3. i'm not fully sure what you are asking,

    yes, no object is perfectly identical to another,

    but that doesn't mean they are necessarily worth less/more.

    if i have two apples, one shaped like a pear, the other like a cucumber, i still have two apples.

     

  4. i dont really understand the question. your picture seem contrary to your description.

    your picture seems to suggest you can cut in any direction, but your description suggests all cuts have to be in the same direction.

    i'll solve both.

    for lines in any direction: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CircleDivisionbyLines.html

    1/2*(n^2 +n +2), n=500; 125251

    5000000 = 1/2*(n^2 +n +2) n=3162

    for cuts in the same direction:

    each cut adds 1 new region.

    for 500 cuts, that 501 rejoins

    to get 5000000 peices 4999999 cuts are needed

  5. i think so.

    for the first number n, n= 1, its fairly trivial, as rocdocmac showed. for larger values, the goal is to get it in a ratio of 1, 2 ,3. to do this, first, let's assume they are in some other configuration, with a<b<c. if a = 1, this is also trivial, we can use the binary approach until a,b c is in the right ratio. if a > 1 we can divide b/a and throw out remainder,  then use the the binary approach before.

    for example, lets say  thee are 48 total beans, with 5 on a, 18 on b, and 25 on c. 18/5 = 3, so the 1's digit on b is 1, so transfer from b to a. a = 10 , b = 13, c = 25. now transfer from b to a one more time, a = 20, b = 3, c = 25  C/B, 8, so transfer from a to b, a = 17, b = 6 c = 25, a to b, a = 11, b = 12, c = 25. then form c to b,  a = 11, b = 24, c = 13.  b is now where we want. than transfer from c to a, a = 22, b = 24 c = 2. then form a to c. a = 20 b = 24 c = 4 a  = 16, b = 24 c = 8.

  6. lets do several steps and see if we can develop such a function.

    1 H

    1 S 1 N

    3 H 1 S

    2 H 3 S 3 N

    9 H 5 S 2 N

    12 H 11 S 9 N

    31 H 21 S 12 N

    54 H 43 S 31 N

     

    so here are our rules.

    Hn = 2*Sn-1 +Nn-1

    Sn = Hn-1 +Nn-1

    Nn = Hn-1

    so, combining  we have...

    Sn = Nn +Nn-1

    then

    Sn-1 = Nn-1 +Nn-2

    thus

    Hn = 2*(Hn-2 +Hn-3) +Hn-2

    Hn = 3*Hn-2 +2*Hn-3

    so...

    F(x) = 1  +3x^2 +2x^3 +9x^4 +12x^5 ...

    3x^2*F(x) =  +3x^2           +9x^4  +6x^5

    2x^3*F(x) =            +2x^3           +6x^5

    F(x)*(1 -3x^2 -2x^3) = 1

    F(x) =1/(1 -3x^2 -2x^3)

    thus it will be the nth term of this series, whatever that is.

     

     

     

  7. since it been a couple weeks without even a guess, I'll go ahead and post my answer and see if anyone can do better. i get 59.

    0 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 0   3   0   2   0   1   0   3   0   1   0   2   0   1   0   4  0   1   0   2   0   3   0    1   0   3   0   2   0   1  0   4   0   1   0   2   0   1   0    3   0   1  

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 

    0    2   0   1   0   4   0   1   0   ?

    51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

     

  8. heres an alternate version that i came up with,

    place the digits 1-n where n is 4 such that no consecutive digit of any step value, starting at step value, repeats.

    here's an example where n is 2.

    0 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 2   0   1   ?   

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

    here starting from 1 and going a step of 1, there are no repeats. starting from 2 and going a step of 2, no repeats, and so on. However there is no way to get 12 without repeating.

    your task is to find the max value for 4.

  9. correct.

     

    one of my questions is about addition.

    basically my question is, given a number system that uses multiplcation as its basis, (multiplying two numbers in recursive format is just concatenation) an you come up with a method for addition?

    ill do 7 as an example

    7 is prime.

    < 7 >

    7 is the 4th prime so replace the 7 with a 4.

    < 4 >

    4 is composite, its factors are 2 and 2.

    < 2 2 >

    2 and 2 are prime.

    <<2><2>>

    the number two is the first prime so cant be reduced further. replace with blank.

    <<><>>

     

×
×
  • Create New...