grey cells
-
Posts
2807 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by grey cells
-
-
The one unquestionable fact happened suddenly because something desired to act intelligently. He...(It)...fainted,despairing. "Why in the bathroom did an umbrella startle me?" Naturally, there must have been
-
Thanks , Noct.I got it.
-
Oh !! Missed that one completely.
-
Hey ! I am not a computer whiz. Sorry ! Noct , I do not get it.
-
-
-
The one unquestionable fact happened suddenly because something desired to act intelligently. He...(It)...fainted,despairing. "Why in the bathroom did an umbrella startle me?" Naturally, there must
-
One fine day , I did it half as many times as you have done now .
-
Yes . I agree with you that the laws that have been formulated have been the result of years and years of hard work. And we cannot simply negate them sitting here and I apologise to those who may have been hurt by my statements . But the bitter truth maybe(just maybe , not is), that is physicists , again after years and years of hardwork may arrive at a conclusion , that may not agree with the already existing laws. But then this all just mere hypothesis and the idea of discussing time travel on this forum here is also just theoritical. So I assume there are no hard feelings.
-
Maybe , but it is not a question without a ?.Hope I am not wrong.
-
I too do not get it . We have to wait for Felipe to give the explanation. But as I said it was not the method on which I had based my question .
-
And abhisk keep trying . If needed see the hints.
-
Good thinking , Felipe. And I frankly did not know about that one.So thanks. But my answer is on a different base of reasoning .
-
That was way too hard(atleast for me) , but hats-off to your thinking.
-
OK . I think this sequence is a bit too vague.
-
-
-
I think what you are mentioning here is called "sidereal time". Though it may be somehow related to time travel , I dont think this will help in explaining the logic of multiverse. Maybe then you are supporting the concept of travelling through time ,i.e. , to the past and future . So then , I am still on favour of multiverse existing , than believing in travelling to the past and future in a time machine.
-
This one's easy. Find the missing number: 4 , 4 , 4 , 3 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 6 , 4 , 5 , _
-
I agree with you , Largeneal , that a sound fundamental basis is required for any topic. And isn't the law of conservation of energy used as a basic principle in most of the phenomenons in this universe? I am sure that the physicists would not proceed with further research in this field without a sound proof or theory to back it . And I accept that I do not have proof of that "proof". But anyway as most of the concepts of physics is theoritical , our discussion of the existence of time travel through multiverse is also theoritical. And the definition of LAW you speak of is certainly not perennial. When Nicolaus Copernicus argued that the Earth was not the centre of the universe , but the sun was , physicists had to reanalyse their work. And now there is no doubt in our minds that the sun is in the centre and earth along with the other planets revolves around the sun. The concepts we are speaking of now , may be devalued in the future by physicists having access to more advanced technology. No concept or law , we know can be proved to be eternal. Time travel through multiverse is a definite possibility , if not a truth.
-
And I guess the policeman took the woman and her penguin for a breath of fresh-prison air.
-
I bet ya the cashier's name was Fibonacci , and the mathematical store(I assume) would have lost a valuable customer.
-
This is the biggest hint. Piece together all the hints , then you will definitely arrive at the answer.
-
Hope it is correct.