Jump to content
BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Today
  2. A big, big, big hotel

    Brilliant, surprisingly interesting and leading to a major annoyance. Well, now back to the original problem. Everybody leaves, the hotel is empty. The green and blue men arrive all together and go to the room they occupied previously. Is this problem equivalent to the first one? Precision: By equivalent, I mean that the problems are announced in a slightly different way, but the answers remain the same. Something this way: Aunt: If I give you 5 bananas and take back 2 bananas, how many bananas have you? John: I do not know. Aunt: I met your teacher and she told me you make this kind of problems at school. John: Yes, but we do it with apples. Just do not tell me that the men know now the room numbers. Besides being clairvoyant, they can move in time. Forwards, backwards and sideways.
  3. Yesterday
  4. Green and Yellow hats again, but harder

    I think I see the pattern here and am encouraged by the beauty of binary symmetry so here goes:
  5. When midnight strikes

    Sorry for 'discard', I meant these numbers build a {set} from which elements can be removed. And yes, we remain in rationals. What if l only paint those between 0.5 and 0.6, even leaving .53745 unpainted? Did I not paint an infinite number of numbers? We turn in round here. You claim that if you can remove an infinite amount of elements from a set, the set will be empty - I claim there may remain some elements (and even more then removed, depending on circumstances). I suppose you apply a 'law' or a 'theorem'. Can you give me the (Wikipedia) reference?
  6. Right Prime

  7. Modified checkerboard destruction

    Can you think of a reason?
  8. Baggage on a conveyor belt

    I see, I didn’t pay attention. I really want to count only segments that are surrounded by shorter segments.
  9. Modified checkerboard destruction

    Thank you for the kind words, Bonanova. I fear my answer to this one is not so brilliant.
  10. A big, big, big hotel

    OK I think I just found your first blue man.
  11. Worth the Weight

    @aiemdao - Yes, nice solve indeed Aiem. Well done. @bonanova - thanks.
  12. Right Prime

    Any other prime numbers less than 1000.
  13. Worth the Weight

    @aiemdao - Nice solve. @plainglazed - Nice puzzle.
  14. Worth the Weight

    4 light ones/48
  15. @CaptainEd brilliantly answered a puzzle that I mis-worded into a much tougher one. Nice job. Here's the puzzle I had intended to post: You have just lost your 143rd straight game of checkers and have vowed never to play another game. To confirm your vow you decide to saw your wooden checkerboard into pieces that contain no more than a single (red or black) square. With each use of the saw you may pick up a piece of the board and make one straight cut, along boundaries of individual squares, completely through to the other side. You wish to inflict as much damage as possible with each cut, so you first calculate the minimum number of saw cuts needed to finish the job. And that number is ... (spoilers appreciated.)
  16. When midnight strikes

    Isn't this fun? The { real numbers } between 0 and 1 comprise two infinite groups: { rationals } and { irrationals }. Rationals (expressible as p/q where p and q are integers) are countably infinite. We can order them, by placing them in an infinite square of p-q space and drawing a serpentine diagonal path. But the irrationals are not countable. The cardinality (notion of size used for infinite sets) of the rationals is called Aleph0 and for the irrationals (and reals) it's called Aleph1 or C (for continuum.) So first off, what we can do with the { numbers } between 0 and 1 depends on { which numbers } we want to deal with. Next, there's a problem that points are not objects that can be moved from place to place, as coins can. Points are more descriptions of space than of autonomous objects. If 0 and 1 are on a number line, the location midway between them is the point denoted by 0.5. It can't be removed. (We could erase the line, I guess, but that would not produce an interval [0 1] devoid of numbers, either.) But we can finesse this matter by "painting" a point. Kind of like what we did when we inscribed a number on each coin. Painting does a little less - it puts a point into a particular group or class but it does not distinguish among them. We can tell coin 2 from coin 3 and also distinguish both from a coin with no inscription. Two blue points, however, are distinguishable from unpainted points, but not from each other. But for our purpose here, painting is actually enough. Since the { rationals } are countable, we can paint them, in sequence, and if we do that at times of 1, 1/2, 1/4 .... minutes before midnight, all the rationals between 0 and 1 will be painted blue by midnight. (I don't know of a similar scheme for completing uncountable task sets, so the irrationals alas must remain unpainted.) Next, instead of asking whether all the points in [0 1] were removed, we can ask, with pretty much the same meaning, whether at this point the entire interval [0 1] has been painted blue. It should be, right? After all, between any two rationals lie countably infinite other rationals. So the paint must have covered the entire interval, right?. Well ... actually ... the answer is counter-intuitively No. And this is because even though the { rationals } are "dense" meaning there are no "gaps" between them, as noted above, the { irrationals } are even "more dense." That is, between any two irrational numbers there are uncountably many other irrationals. That means, for every blue point we created in the interval [0 1] there are uncountably many unpainted points. We can't magnify the line greatly enough to "see" individual points, but "if we could," if we were lucky enough to come across a single blue point we'd have to pan our camera over uncountably many unpainted points before we saw another blue one. In measure theory, the measure of the rationals over any interval is zero. The measure of the irrationals over [0 1] is unity. So what of our quest of emptying [0 1] of points? It's the same as our quest to paint [0 1] blue by painting all the rational numbers in that interval. (Reminding ourselves that there were too many irrationals to paint one at a time.) Turning again to measure theory, the measure of the "blueness" of the interval would be zero. That means we would not see even the hint of a faint blue haze. Back to our "empty the interval by removing the rationals" quest, Nope. [0 1] would not be empty: uncountably many points (numbers) would remain.
  17. Right Prime

    Some amount of primes.
  18. Last week
  19. Right Prime

    Say 5939 is a "right" prime because it remains prime after dropping any number of digits from the right: 5939, 593, 59, and 5 are all prime. How many right primes are there less than 1000?
  20. Four dogs are positioned at the corners of a square (d=1m), chase each other in clockwise direction with the same constant speed . As their target is moving, they will follow a curved path, eventually colliding in the center of the square. Why is the total length of the path just 1m?
  21. Worth the Weight

    I think I've got it. Nah, I definitely don't have it. I can't account for one particular case.
  22. When midnight strikes

    Maybe an idea. There is an infinite number of numbers between 0 and 1. I have the opportunity to discard an infinite number of numbers between 0 and 1. How much are you willing to bet that nothing remains between 0 and 1?
  23. Worth the Weight

    This is a nice puzzle.
  24. When midnight strikes

    That is what infinity does to our brains. Al retains coin 2 at step 1. But Al discards coin 2 at step 2. What is true for coin 2 is true for every coin. Every coin has a scheduled pre-midnight discard date. So "what happened to the N coins not discarded?" If N is finite, then it's not midnight yet, and the box does in fact contain coins. We have to be patient. The process has to run its course. And, specifically, {coin n+1} will be discarded at step n+1, at time t n+1, prior to midnight. So after midnight, it will be gone. Along with all the others. Every coin, identified by the number engraved on it, has a well-defined pre-midnight discard date. But then if we're Bert, who never schedules the discard of an odd coin, we'll have a ton of coins.
  25. When midnight strikes

    I would dispute your first point. I can't immediately think of a scenario that permits a discard which will not eventually happen given an infinite number of opportunities. Can you provide one? We agree on the second point. My previous post answers precisely that question.
  26. Destroying a checkerboard

    @CaptainEd Wow. Not the answer I had in mind -- a much better one! Nice. Bonus (slightly modified) version. Same question, but this time no cut may end short of the opposite edge. It must go entirely through the piece being cut.
  1. Load more activity