What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread? - Back to the Paradoxes
What is better than eternal bliss? Nothing. But a slice of bread is better than nothing. So slice of bread is more than eternal bliss.
What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread?
#1
Posted 09 June 2007 - 01:01 PM
rookie1ja (site admin)
Optical Illusions
BrainDen.com - spread the word
Motto: 'To Start Press Any Key'. Where's the ANY key? - Homer Simpson
Optical Illusions
BrainDen.com - spread the word
Motto: 'To Start Press Any Key'. Where's the ANY key? - Homer Simpson
#2
Posted 12 June 2007 - 02:34 AM
Quote
What is better - eternal bliss or a simple bread? - Back to the Paradoxes
What is better than eternal bliss? Nothing. But a slice of bread is better than nothing. So slice of bread is more than eternal bliss.
What is better than eternal bliss? Nothing. But a slice of bread is better than nothing. So slice of bread is more than eternal bliss.
This one is fun.
I think that as stated the thing that leads to a paradox is that "bread is better than nothing". Bread is 'good' but it isn't better than nothing. Things can be 'nuetral', 'good' and 'better' and "nothing" is not a thing.
#5
Posted 26 June 2007 - 03:14 AM
Isn't this moreso a case of zero versus null?
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
#6
Posted 29 June 2007 - 10:10 AM
Quote
Isn't this moreso a case of zero versus null?
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
Null is preferable to X
0+1 is preferable to 0
ergo 0+1 is preferable to null
Zero and one can be ranked because they have relative value. Null can't be ranked since it's valueless. This is a paradox because people confuse zero with null; zero is a value while null is an absence of value.
Yeah, that's along the lines of what I am saying. Bread is not better than nothing because nothing is null and things can't be compared to null.
#8
Posted 03 July 2007 - 02:32 AM
yeah, this is no paradox. There isn't just two states: Good and Not-Good. there's a huge range of things that are SortofGood, Okay, Bad. You know what i mean? the "nothing" in the statement "Nothing is better than eternal bliss" doesnt refer to the "lack of anything" it means "eternal bliss is better than everything" so its just another play on words, not a true paradox
...Reality has been pwned... by VNA.4!!!

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? All is explained.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? All is explained.
#10
Posted 06 July 2007 - 04:42 PM
exactly... they are both better than nothing... but eternal bliss is a hell of a lot better!
...Reality has been pwned... by VNA.4!!!

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? All is explained.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? All is explained.

Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply





MultiQuote
