Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Round vs. Square

42 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Round vs. Square - Back to the River Crossing Puzzles

Why is it better for manhole covers to be round rather than square?

This old topic is locked since it was answered many times. You can check solution in the Spoiler below.

Pls visit New Puzzles section to see always fresh brain teasers.

Round vs. Square - solution

You can turn a square manhole cover sideways and drop it down the diagonal of the manhole. You cannot drop a round manhole cover down the manhole. Therefore, round manhole covers are safer and more practical than square ones.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

another interview question =)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The obvious answer is that manhole covers should be round because manholes are round.

But your answer is more informative.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Correct-a-mundo!!! There is not a single shape (besides perfectly round) that could not be positioned in a way that would cause it to fall in the hole. None what-so-ever! It's funny to think that even Manhole Covers were thought out well before mass production began. You would just think they were round because they were going on a ROUND HOLE...lol

Also, seeing as how the damn things weigh about 38 gazillion pounds, trying to lift one is not an easy task. The method to move them typically is "Rolling them". Needless to say, trying to ROLL a 4 edged square hunk of metal would

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Correct-a-mundo!!! There is not a single shape (besides perfectly round) that could not be positioned in a way that would cause it to fall in the hole. None what-so-ever! It's funny to think that even Manhole Covers were thought out well before mass production began. You would just think they were round because they were going on a ROUND HOLE...lol

Also, seeing as how the damn things weigh about 38 gazillion pounds, trying to lift one is not an easy task. The method to move them typically is "Rolling them". Needless to say, trying to ROLL a 4 edged square hunk of metal would <!-- s:oops: --><!-- s:oops: -->

Veracity, the veracity of your statement is suspect:

"There is not a single shape (besides perfectly round) that could not be positioned in a way that would cause it to fall in the hole." , You couldn't be more wrong!

heard of "constant diameter curves" ?

A circle is just one of many such curves:

read This

and This

That said, you are bang on target with your second statement about the ease of rolling

R

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Correct-a-mundo!!! There is not a single shape (besides perfectly round) that could not be positioned in a way that would cause it to fall in the hole. None what-so-ever! It's funny to think that even Manhole Covers were thought out well before mass production began. You would just think they were round because they were going on a ROUND HOLE...lol

Also, seeing as how the damn things weigh about 38 gazillion pounds, trying to lift one is not an easy task. The method to move them typically is "Rolling them". Needless to say, trying to ROLL a 4 edged square hunk of metal would

Veracity, the veracity of your statement is suspect:

"There is not a single shape (besides perfectly round) that could not be positioned in a way that would cause it to fall in the hole." , You couldn't be more wrong!

heard of "constant diameter curves" ?

A circle is just one of many such curves:

read This

and This

That said, you are bang on target with your second statement about the ease of rolling

R

Well, Look at that.. Your right. I stand corrected. I love learning new things. Thank you for taking the time to add a link to back your reasoning up....!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

While it may not be correct that it is the only shape that won't fall through the hole, it appears to be the only one that won't fall through and actually serves the purpose of a manhole cover -- to cover the manhole. Of course, if you were just trying to prove someone wrong so you looked smart, congrats!

Dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

While it may not be correct that it is the only shape that won't fall through the hole, it appears to be the only one that won't fall through and actually serves the purpose of a manhole cover -- to cover the manhole. Of course, if you were just trying to prove someone wrong so you looked smart, congrats!

Dave

LOL

I wasn't going to say anything figuring if I had it would look like I was Making Excuses to Justify my being Incorrect... But since you mentioned it...lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

One of the English' coins is a condiam (constant diameter curve).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

a round lid covers more area of the square then a square lid to help from it leaking (why they dont want it to leak its a sur) and you can roll it out of the way making it easier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

(After Google-Imaging)

They condiam coins are the 20p and 50p ones.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

a triangle shaped cover wouldnt fall into a triangle shapped hole either

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

a triangle shaped cover wouldnt fall into a triangle shapped hole either

i was about to say this however i should add that it's only an equilateral triangle that won't fall through.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

a triangle shaped cover wouldnt fall into a triangle shapped hole either

i was about to say this however i should add that it's only an equilateral triangle that won't fall through.

While you could create a cover/hole combination where a triangle wouldn't fall through, it is not a certainty.

It all depends on the lip width and thickness of the cover material.

An equilateral triangle has a maximum diameter (the length of a side) that is ~1.15 times the minimum diameter (center of a side to the opposite vertex).

  ______

 |		  /

 |		/	

 x	  /		

 |_   /___________

	  |--1.15x--|

 - Dimensions
So as long as the lip isn't too wide and the cover isn't too thick, it will fall through. Turn the cover so a one side of the triangle is vertical and the bottom or top is flat against a side of the hole.
		  /|

	   /   |

	/	  |

		  |

		  |

		  |

~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

(long side of hole)

 - Side view



			/		<- hole

		  /	

		/		

	  / ==========	<- cover (===)

	 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

 -Top view

In any non-equilateral triangle the ratio of maximum diameter to minimum diameter gets larger and it is easer to fit the cover through the hole.

(sorry for the ugly drawings)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Well, I'd imagine because you can't fit a square into a circle.

And if they didn't have a manhole itself as a circle, and had it as a square, maybe it wouldn't be right because people who climb down there are generally fat? No idea on that one there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

ahhh this is the stupidest question ever!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Its round either because people are round, and its easier to traverse, or that pointy manhole covers would bend/break.

-=society works cause we think it does=-

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There are many answers I believe some of them are of which is they are safer with no points/verticies to poke people. Fits in any orientation, square won't if you rotate them 45 degrees. As well as the others already mentioned

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

i have the perfect answer. they arent square so you dont stub your feet on them if they stick up too much.

lol!!

oh and haha i though this was a messed up face not a lightbulb haha

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

square would be better in my oppion because you can put hinges on it easily.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

But hinges would either create an uneven driving surface if it was designed to have the cover flip 180 degrees, or the cover would be stick strait up perpendicular to the road. This would be a hazard since it could slam on someones head, or could make a driving hazard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Why would they want hinges on it anyway? it would be way to hard to lift.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

But what about a semi-circle? A shape that will not fall through the shape of the hole...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Bingo excellent logic

Moreover in a unit dimension

a round has more are than a square

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

A circle or condiam (continuous diameter curve) aren't the only shapes that aren't susceptible to falling through the hole: any triangle would be safe from this too. But climbing through a triangular hole would just be silly; and moving a triangular cover would be inefficient as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.