Spoiler for odd
1 has only 1 as a factor so sum is 1
![]() |
Welcome to BrainDen.com - Brain Teasers Forum. Like most online communities you must register to post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process. To be a part of BrainDen Forums you may create a new account or sign in if you already have an account. As a member you could start new topics, reply to others, subscribe to topics/forums to get automatic updates, get your own profile and make new friends. Of course, you can also enjoy our collection of amazing optical illusions and cool math games. If you like our site, you may support us by simply clicking Google "+1" or Facebook "Like" buttons at the top. If you have a website, we would appreciate a little link to BrainDen. Thanks and enjoy the Den :-) |
Not Telling
Utkrisht123 hasn't added any friends yet.
23 March 2013 - 03:40 PM
Spoiler for odd1 factors 1, 1 sum =2 i.e. 2*1
1 has only 1 as a factor so sum is 1
20 March 2013 - 09:43 AM
Spoiler for possiblyGroup-one: 83,7,4,5
Group-two: 91,2,6
Good can you find one more
to get marked as best answer because there is one more competitor.
First one to give one more solution will be marked best answer
20 March 2013 - 09:41 AM
Spoiler for here's maybe oneGroup 1: 18,9,3,6
Group 2: 27, 4,5
both add up to 36
Good can you find one more
to get marked as best answer because there is one more competitor.
20 March 2013 - 09:36 AM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Arrange these numbers into two separate groups so that they add up to same total.
Note : you cant turn 9 upside down and make it 6
Spoiler for Looks likeYou have to turn the 9 into a six.
Numbers 1-9 total 45, which can't be evenly split.
Making the 9 a 6 reduces that total by 3 to 42.
So we need two groups that each total 21.
1 2 3 4 5 6 and 6 7 8 should do it.
Or turn the 6 into 9, increasing the total by 3 to 48.
1 2 3 4 5 9 and 7 8 9 do it for that case.
There is one solution in which you don't have to turn 6 into 9 or 9 into 6
The one who will give me that answer will be marked as best answer
So common guys give it a try
18 March 2013 - 08:20 AM
The stipulation that all 31 rectangles are “of the same size” is still a bit ambiguous. The size could be interpreted as area. If rectangles were equal that would imply they are equal in area (2 squares each) and dimensions. However, do we need a stipulation that rectangles must be alined on square boundaries?
If rectangle's dimensions were specified as 1x2, then the problem would be solved by googon97 in post #5.
But those rectangles could be 1/3 x 6, or 1/2 x 4. Still, it is impossible to cover up the board with 31 of those rectangles.
Furthermore, can we prove that we could or could not cover the board with 31 equal area (2 squares each) rectangles of any dimensions?
If you want to then You are welcome to do so
Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.4
Licensed to: BrainDen
